PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIRVX vs. SWMRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIRVX vs. SWMRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund (FIRVX) and Schwab Target 2045 Fund (SWMRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIRVX achieves a 1,440,933.92% return, which is significantly higher than SWMRX's 8.11% return. Over the past 10 years, FIRVX has outperformed SWMRX with an annualized return of 176.04%, while SWMRX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.92% annualized return.


FIRVX

1D
1,371,718.18%
1M
1,382,668.54%
YTD
1,440,933.92%
6M
1,436,828.54%
1Y
1,530,611.82%
3Y*
2,512.79%
5Y*
597.67%
10Y*
176.04%

SWMRX

1D
-1.51%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
8.11%
6M
7.26%
1Y
19.74%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
8.10%
10Y*
10.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIRVX vs. SWMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIRVX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund
1,440,933.92%12.25%5.86%10.72%-14.63%6.77%12.06%16.19%-4.45%13.32%
SWMRX
Schwab Target 2045 Fund
8.11%18.84%13.37%20.10%-19.24%16.85%14.95%23.95%-9.82%21.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FIRVX and SWMRX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2013

0.92

The correlation between FIRVX and SWMRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIRVX vs. SWMRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIRVX
FIRVX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FIRVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIRVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIRVX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FIRVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIRVX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

SWMRX
SWMRX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SWMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SWMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIRVX vs. SWMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund (FIRVX) and Schwab Target 2045 Fund (SWMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIRVXSWMRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+351,353.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

49,085.82

1.34

+49,084.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

356,370.91

2.46

+356,368.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1,512,145.77

10.63

+1,512,135.14

FIRVX vs. SWMRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIRVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the SWMRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIRVX and SWMRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIRVX vs. SWMRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIRVX drawdown since its inception was -40.59%, which is greater than SWMRX's maximum drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIRVX and SWMRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIRVXSWMRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.59%

-30.41%

-10.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.51%

-8.62%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.52%

-14.20%

+7.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.10%

-30.12%

+10.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.10%

-30.41%

+10.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.98%

+1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-5.16%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

1.99%

-0.93%

Volatility

FIRVX vs. SWMRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund (FIRVX) has a higher volatility of 952.63% compared to Schwab Target 2045 Fund (SWMRX) at 4.66%. This indicates that FIRVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWMRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIRVXSWMRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

952.63%

4.66%

+947.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

952.62%

9.47%

+943.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1,374,447.92%

11.56%

+1,374,436.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

614,671.81%

15.51%

+614,656.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

434,465.54%

15.48%

+434,450.06%

FIRVX vs. SWMRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIRVX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than SWMRX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIRVX vs. SWMRX - Dividend Comparison

FIRVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 102.87%, more than SWMRX's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIRVX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund
102.87%2.83%2.74%2.57%3.52%4.61%3.74%3.18%6.90%25.16%2.28%4.45%
SWMRX
Schwab Target 2045 Fund
4.79%5.18%3.14%2.98%7.88%5.18%2.45%5.46%6.63%2.79%5.28%5.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FIRVX and SWMRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIRVX has higher volatility (952.63%) compared to SWMRX (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIRVX dropped -40.59% vs SWMRX's -30.41%.

SWMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIRVX and SWMRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer