PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWMRX vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWMRX vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2045 Fund (SWMRX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SWMRX having a 9.87% return and VTI slightly higher at 10.35%. Over the past 10 years, SWMRX has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 10.79%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.31% annualized return.


SWMRX

1D
1.03%
1M
1.28%
YTD
9.87%
6M
9.67%
1Y
24.00%
3Y*
16.50%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
10.79%

VTI

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.55%
YTD
10.35%
6M
9.59%
1Y
27.18%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
15.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWMRX vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWMRX
Schwab Target 2045 Fund
9.87%18.84%13.37%20.10%-19.24%16.85%14.95%23.95%-9.82%21.39%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
10.35%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SWMRX and VTI is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2013

0.96

The correlation between SWMRX and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWMRX vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWMRX
SWMRX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SWMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SWMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWMRX vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2045 Fund (SWMRX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWMRXVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.38

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

3.06

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.90

13.68

-1.78

SWMRX vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWMRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWMRX and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWMRX vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWMRX drawdown since its inception was -30.41%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWMRX and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWMRXVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.41%

-55.45%

+25.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.62%

-8.92%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.20%

-19.30%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.12%

-25.36%

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.41%

-35.00%

+4.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-1.48%

+1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-8.01%

+2.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.99%

0.00%

Volatility

SWMRX vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2045 Fund (SWMRX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) have volatilities of 4.52% and 4.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWMRXVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

4.74%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

9.96%

-0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.46%

12.76%

-1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.50%

17.49%

-1.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

18.35%

-2.81%

SWMRX vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWMRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWMRX vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

SWMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than VTI's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWMRX
Schwab Target 2045 Fund
4.71%5.18%3.14%2.98%7.88%5.18%2.45%5.46%6.63%2.79%5.28%5.76%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.02%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SWMRX and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTI has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to SWMRX (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWMRX dropped -30.41% vs VTI's -55.45%.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWMRX and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer