FIRVX vs. ECAT

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FIRVX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund) and ECAT (BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust) are both mutual funds - FIRVX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by BlackRock, while ECAT is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 3 years, FIRVX returned 2512.79%/yr vs 19.40%/yr for ECAT. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIRVX charges 0.47%/yr vs 1.43%/yr for ECAT.

Performance

FIRVX vs. ECAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund (FIRVX) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIRVX achieves a 1,440,933.92% return, which is significantly higher than ECAT's 11.55% return.

FIRVX

• 1D: 1,371,718.18%
• 1M: 1,382,668.54%
• YTD: 1,440,933.92%
• 6M: 1,436,828.54%
• 1Y: 1,530,611.82%
• 3Y*: 2,512.79%
• 5Y*: 597.67%
• 10Y*: 176.04%

ECAT

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 1.72%
• YTD: 11.55%
• 6M: 10.12%
• 1Y: 20.17%
• 3Y*: 19.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIRVX vs. ECAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FIRVX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund	1,440,933.92%	12.25%	5.86%	10.72%	-14.63%	0.77%
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust	11.55%	16.64%	19.96%	32.36%	-21.90%	-6.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FIRVX and ECAT is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2021	0.66

The correlation between FIRVX and ECAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIRVX vs. ECAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIRVX

FIRVX Risk / Return Rank: 85
FIRVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
FIRVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
FIRVX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
FIRVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
FIRVX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

ECAT

ECAT Risk / Return Rank: 30
ECAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
ECAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
ECAT Omega Ratio Rank: 30
ECAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
ECAT Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIRVX vs. ECAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund (FIRVX) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIRVX	ECAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	1.47	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	351,355.56	2.11	+351,353.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	49,085.82	1.26	+49,084.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	356,370.91	1.72	+356,369.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1,512,145.77	6.38	+1,512,139.39

FIRVX vs. ECAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIRVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the ECAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIRVX and ECAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIRVX vs. ECAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIRVX drawdown since its inception was -40.59%, which is greater than ECAT's maximum drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIRVX and ECAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIRVX	ECAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.59%	-32.23%	-8.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.51%	-11.80%	+7.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.52%	-15.79%	+9.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.10%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.91%	+0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.97%	-9.02%	+4.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	3.17%	-2.11%

Volatility

FIRVX vs. ECAT - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund (FIRVX) has a higher volatility of 952.63% compared to BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) at 4.31%. This indicates that FIRVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIRVX	ECAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	952.63%	4.31%	+948.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	952.62%	10.90%	+941.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1,374,447.92%	13.79%	+1,374,434.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	614,671.81%	16.88%	+614,654.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	434,465.54%	16.88%	+434,448.66%

FIRVX vs. ECAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIRVX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than ECAT's 1.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIRVX vs. ECAT - Dividend Comparison

FIRVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 102.87%, more than ECAT's 21.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust	21.88%	23.00%	17.44%	9.14%	8.94%	0.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FIRVX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund	102.87%	2.83%	2.74%	2.57%	3.52%	4.61%	3.74%	3.18%	6.90%	25.16%	2.28%	4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIRVX and ECAT in my portfolio?

FIRVX and ECAT have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIRVX or ECAT?

FIRVX has higher volatility (952.63%) compared to ECAT (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIRVX dropped -40.59% vs ECAT's -32.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ECAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.