PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIRMX vs. GMHZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIRMX vs. GMHZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund (FIRMX) and GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund (GMHZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIRMX achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly lower than GMHZX's 7.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FIRMX has underperformed GMHZX with an annualized return of 4.19%, while GMHZX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.94% annualized return.


FIRMX

1D
0.03%
1M
1.12%
YTD
3.83%
6M
4.28%
1Y
10.21%
3Y*
7.51%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
4.19%

GMHZX

1D
0.08%
1M
3.05%
YTD
7.73%
6M
8.67%
1Y
19.28%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
7.04%
10Y*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIRMX vs. GMHZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIRMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund
3.83%9.95%4.29%8.07%-11.66%2.77%8.57%10.57%-1.80%7.08%
GMHZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund
7.73%15.50%11.48%15.82%-16.48%13.07%12.91%22.18%-6.84%18.55%

Correlation

The correlation between FIRMX and GMHZX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.89

The correlation between FIRMX and GMHZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (5 years) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIRMX vs. GMHZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIRMX
FIRMX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FIRMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIRMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIRMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FIRMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIRMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

GMHZX
GMHZX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
GMHZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMHZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMHZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
GMHZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMHZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIRMX vs. GMHZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund (FIRMX) and GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund (GMHZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIRMXGMHZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.46

2.29

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.62

3.26

+0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.43

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

2.81

+0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.78

12.58

+0.20

FIRMX vs. GMHZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIRMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the GMHZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIRMX and GMHZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIRMXGMHZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.29

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.64

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.73

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.37

+0.18

Drawdowns

FIRMX vs. GMHZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIRMX drawdown since its inception was -33.73%, smaller than the maximum GMHZX drawdown of -56.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIRMX and GMHZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIRMXGMHZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.73%

-56.35%

+22.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.44%

-7.05%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.96%

-11.04%

+6.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.11%

-22.86%

+6.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.11%

-26.98%

+10.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.71%

-8.21%

+4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

1.57%

-0.76%

Volatility

FIRMX vs. GMHZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund (FIRMX) is 1.64%, while GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund (GMHZX) has a volatility of 2.72%. This indicates that FIRMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMHZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIRMXGMHZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.64%

2.72%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.42%

6.96%

-3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.16%

8.67%

-4.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.28%

11.13%

-5.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.51%

12.22%

-7.71%

FIRMX vs. GMHZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIRMX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than GMHZX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIRMX vs. GMHZX - Dividend Comparison

FIRMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than GMHZX's 5.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIRMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund
3.10%3.13%3.02%2.81%4.54%3.56%2.48%2.59%4.65%8.57%1.67%1.68%
GMHZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund
5.26%5.66%7.10%3.67%7.20%5.38%3.08%3.40%7.27%3.86%0.87%19.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIRMX and GMHZX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMHZX has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to FIRMX (1.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIRMX dropped -33.73% vs GMHZX's -56.35%.

FIRMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIRMX and GMHZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer