PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIRMX vs. FRQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIRMX vs. FRQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund (FIRMX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FIRMX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FRQAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
2.48%
YTD
3.51%
1Y
8.09%
3Y*
7.10%
5Y*
2.44%
10Y*
4.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIRMX vs. FRQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIRMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund
3.60%9.95%4.29%8.07%-11.66%2.77%8.57%10.57%-1.80%7.08%
FRQAX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A
3.51%9.54%4.21%8.24%-12.60%3.56%9.32%12.33%-3.06%10.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FIRMX and FRQAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2007

0.99

The correlation between FIRMX and FRQAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIRMX vs. FRQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIRMX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FRQAX
FRQAX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FRQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIRMX vs. FRQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund (FIRMX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIRMXFRQAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.55

FIRMX vs. FRQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIRMX vs. FRQAX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIRMXFRQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

Volatility

FIRMX vs. FRQAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIRMXFRQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.28%

FIRMX vs. FRQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIRMX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQAX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIRMX vs. FRQAX - Dividend Comparison

FIRMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than FRQAX's 2.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIRMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund
3.12%3.13%3.02%2.81%4.54%3.56%2.48%2.59%4.65%8.57%1.67%1.68%
FRQAX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A
2.89%2.72%2.71%2.46%4.74%5.76%3.26%2.93%5.33%16.05%2.18%3.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FIRMX and FRQAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIRMX and FRQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer