PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIQZX vs. NMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIQZX vs. NMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class Z (FIQZX) and Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIQZX achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than NMI's 11.65% return.


FIQZX

1D
0.20%
1M
0.65%
YTD
0.93%
6M
1.29%
1Y
6.21%
3Y*
4.19%
5Y*
1.49%
10Y*

NMI

1D
1.25%
1M
11.12%
YTD
11.65%
6M
11.63%
1Y
16.67%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
2.69%
10Y*
2.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIQZX vs. NMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIQZX
Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class Z
0.93%6.10%1.69%5.56%-6.70%0.87%4.60%6.39%2.16%
NMI
Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc.
11.65%10.52%7.03%1.90%-15.09%3.86%4.70%16.02%2.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FIQZX and NMI is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

0.21

The correlation between FIQZX and NMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.26 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIQZX vs. NMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIQZX
FIQZX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FIQZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

NMI
NMI Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
NMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMI Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
NMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMI Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIQZX vs. NMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class Z (FIQZX) and Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIQZXNMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

1.27

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

1.53

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.69

3.59

+3.10

FIQZX vs. NMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIQZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is higher than the NMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIQZX and NMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIQZXNMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72

1.05

+1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.19

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.34

+0.43

Drawdowns

FIQZX vs. NMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIQZX drawdown since its inception was -10.85%, smaller than the maximum NMI drawdown of -28.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQZX and NMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIQZXNMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.85%

-28.92%

+18.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

-10.96%

+7.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.95%

-14.54%

+10.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.85%

-28.92%

+18.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-1.06%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.25%

-5.92%

+3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

4.65%

-3.72%

Volatility

FIQZX vs. NMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class Z (FIQZX) is 0.91%, while Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that FIQZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIQZXNMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

7.35%

-6.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.83%

13.32%

-11.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30%

15.90%

-13.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.06%

14.46%

-11.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.55%

14.93%

-11.38%

FIQZX vs. NMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIQZX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than NMI's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIQZX vs. NMI - Dividend Comparison

FIQZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than NMI's 4.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIQZX
Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class Z
2.93%3.78%2.96%2.47%1.58%1.70%2.23%2.44%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NMI
Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc.
4.19%4.59%4.63%4.04%3.51%3.22%3.53%4.15%5.12%4.21%4.45%4.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIQZX and NMI have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMI has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to FIQZX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQZX dropped -10.85% vs NMI's -28.92%.

FIQZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIQZX and NMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer