PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIQVX vs. CICVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIQVX vs. CICVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class Z (FIQVX) and Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FIQVX having a 24.03% return and CICVX slightly higher at 24.54%.


FIQVX

1D
0.90%
1M
6.55%
YTD
24.03%
6M
24.47%
1Y
44.02%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*

CICVX

1D
1.09%
1M
7.09%
YTD
24.54%
6M
24.75%
1Y
45.24%
3Y*
20.34%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
12.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIQVX vs. CICVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIQVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class Z
24.03%18.42%8.21%11.53%-15.27%10.04%42.63%28.74%-6.03%
CICVX
Calamos Convertible Fund
24.54%19.03%9.94%10.95%-21.02%5.36%48.84%19.51%-6.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FIQVX and CICVX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2018

0.96

The correlation between FIQVX and CICVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIQVX vs. CICVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIQVX
FIQVX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FIQVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

CICVX
CICVX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CICVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CICVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CICVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CICVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CICVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIQVX vs. CICVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class Z (FIQVX) and Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIQVXCICVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.03

3.12

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.90

4.01

-0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.54

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.27

5.99

+0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.64

23.32

+1.32

FIQVX vs. CICVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIQVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is comparable to the CICVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIQVX and CICVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIQVXCICVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03

3.12

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.63

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.35

+0.63

Drawdowns

FIQVX vs. CICVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIQVX drawdown since its inception was -25.04%, smaller than the maximum CICVX drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQVX and CICVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIQVXCICVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.04%

-49.33%

+24.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.10%

-7.70%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.86%

-14.79%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.16%

-27.17%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-17.48%

+10.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

1.98%

-0.17%

Volatility

FIQVX vs. CICVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class Z (FIQVX) is 4.80%, while Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that FIQVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CICVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIQVXCICVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

5.11%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.85%

12.12%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.83%

14.83%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.48%

12.87%

+0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.05%

12.88%

+2.17%

FIQVX vs. CICVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIQVX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CICVX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIQVX vs. CICVX - Dividend Comparison

FIQVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.01%, less than CICVX's 10.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CICVX
Calamos Convertible Fund
10.12%12.51%1.83%2.48%0.94%15.90%7.74%1.39%16.75%4.55%3.43%5.41%
FIQVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class Z
9.01%11.52%2.13%2.24%3.88%20.80%10.85%3.40%8.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FIQVX and CICVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CICVX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to FIQVX (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQVX dropped -25.04% vs CICVX's -49.33%.

CICVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 3.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIQVX and CICVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer