FIQRX vs. FCSSX
FIQRX (Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class Z) and FCSSX (Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund) are both Commodities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FIQRX returned 13.10%/yr vs 10.04%/yr for FCSSX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIQRX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FCSSX.
Performance
FIQRX vs. FCSSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIQRX achieves a 15.98% return, which is significantly higher than FCSSX's 13.12% return.
FIQRX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -5.58%
- YTD
- 15.98%
- 6M
- 15.37%
- 1Y
- 36.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.10%
- 10Y*
- —
FCSSX
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -6.57%
- YTD
- 13.12%
- 6M
- 11.60%
- 1Y
- 20.73%
- 3Y*
- 10.84%
- 5Y*
- 10.04%
- 10Y*
- 5.85%
FIQRX vs. FCSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIQRX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class Z | 15.98% | 28.74% | 3.10% | -5.03% | 20.90% | 26.24% | 6.27% | 18.10% | -13.01% |
FCSSX Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund | 13.12% | 15.43% | 5.36% | -8.25% | 18.11% | 27.59% | -3.11% | 7.41% | -11.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIQRX and FCSSX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.59 |
The correlation between FIQRX and FCSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIQRX vs. FCSSX — Risk / Return Rank
FIQRX
FCSSX
FIQRX vs. FCSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class Z (FIQRX) and Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIQRX | FCSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.23 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.14 | 1.90 | +2.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.97 | 6.59 | +8.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIQRX vs. FCSSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIQRX drawdown since its inception was -45.62%, smaller than the maximum FCSSX drawdown of -66.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQRX and FCSSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIQRX | FCSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.62% | -66.04% | +20.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.72% | -9.73% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.20% | -11.43% | -7.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.18% | -24.07% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.44% | -15.37% | +6.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.38% | -36.12% | +26.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 3.13% | -0.72% |
Volatility
FIQRX vs. FCSSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class Z (FIQRX) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) at 3.08%. This indicates that FIQRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIQRX | FCSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 3.08% | +2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.84% | 11.88% | +1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.00% | 14.28% | +2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 15.92% | +5.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.21% | 14.32% | +9.89% |
FIQRX vs. FCSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIQRX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FCSSX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIQRX vs. FCSSX - Dividend Comparison
FIQRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than FCSSX's 2.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSSX Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund | 2.38% | 2.69% | 12.74% | 4.53% | 128.24% | 41.74% | 0.44% | 1.49% | 6.76% | 0.53% |
FIQRX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class Z | 2.22% | 2.58% | 2.74% | 2.28% | 1.99% | 3.55% | 1.66% | 3.34% | 2.58% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIQRX and FCSSX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIQRX has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to FCSSX (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQRX dropped -45.62% vs FCSSX's -66.04%.
FIQRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIQRX and FCSSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer