FIQLX vs. MJFOX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX) and Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX).
FIQLX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018. MJFOX is managed by Matthews. It was launched on Dec 30, 1998.
Performance
FIQLX vs. MJFOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIQLX vs. MJFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIQLX Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z | 2.59% | 31.84% | 7.43% | 16.09% | -22.16% | 3.32% | 25.58% | 25.93% | -11.46% |
MJFOX Matthews Japan Fund | -1.91% | 22.72% | 16.31% | 25.79% | -27.84% | -5.79% | 29.80% | 26.08% | -14.14% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIQLX achieves a 2.59% return, which is significantly higher than MJFOX's -1.91% return.
FIQLX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -12.73%
- YTD
- 2.59%
- 6M
- 5.97%
- 1Y
- 32.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 6.19%
- 10Y*
- —
MJFOX
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -14.22%
- YTD
- -1.91%
- 6M
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- 19.54%
- 3Y*
- 17.66%
- 5Y*
- 4.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIQLX vs. MJFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIQLX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than MJFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIQLX vs. MJFOX — Risk / Return Rank
FIQLX
MJFOX
FIQLX vs. MJFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX) and Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIQLX | MJFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 0.84 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | 1.30 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.17 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 1.16 | +0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.19 | 4.14 | +4.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIQLX | MJFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 0.84 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.24 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.33 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIQLX and MJFOX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIQLX vs. MJFOX - Dividend Comparison
FIQLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.79%, more than MJFOX's 2.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIQLX Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z | 9.79% | 10.04% | 5.04% | 3.88% | 0.00% | 11.89% | 1.97% | 1.35% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MJFOX Matthews Japan Fund | 2.00% | 1.96% | 2.12% | 6.09% | 7.19% | 8.08% | 10.15% | 8.63% | 4.14% | 3.90% | 1.15% |
Drawdowns
FIQLX vs. MJFOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIQLX drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, smaller than the maximum MJFOX drawdown of -63.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQLX and MJFOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIQLX | MJFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.13% | -63.52% | +27.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.73% | -14.53% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.13% | -42.85% | +6.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.73% | -14.53% | +1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.48% | -21.37% | +10.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 4.06% | -0.55% |
Volatility
FIQLX vs. MJFOX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX) has a higher volatility of 9.75% compared to Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX) at 9.26%. This indicates that FIQLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MJFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIQLX | MJFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.75% | 9.26% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.15% | 16.33% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.81% | 22.97% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 20.16% | -0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 18.73% | +1.00% |