PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIQDX vs. FSPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIQDX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FIQDX having a 8.84% return and FSPGX slightly lower at 8.60%.


FIQDX

1D
0.31%
1M
0.10%
YTD
8.84%
6M
9.09%
1Y
16.83%
3Y*
10.24%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*

FSPGX

1D
-0.38%
1M
7.10%
YTD
8.60%
6M
7.98%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
25.53%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIQDX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIQDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z
8.84%10.40%6.03%4.55%-3.17%15.96%3.79%10.63%-4.90%
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
8.60%18.54%33.27%42.77%-29.17%27.57%38.46%36.38%-14.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FIQDX and FSPGX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2018

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between FIQDX and FSPGX has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIQDX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIQDX
FIQDX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FIQDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPGX
FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIQDX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIQDXFSPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

1.32

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.62

1.76

+6.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

32.18

5.90

+26.28

FIQDX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIQDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.62, which is higher than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIQDX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIQDXFSPGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.62

1.85

+1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.75

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.90

0.00

Drawdowns

FIQDX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIQDX drawdown since its inception was -19.98%, smaller than the maximum FSPGX drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQDX and FSPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIQDXFSPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.98%

-32.66%

+12.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.94%

-16.17%

+14.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.91%

-23.32%

+17.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.79%

-32.66%

+19.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.38%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-6.37%

+3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

4.81%

-4.29%

Volatility

FIQDX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX) is 1.32%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 3.32%. This indicates that FIQDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIQDXFSPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

3.32%

-2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.61%

11.58%

-7.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.65%

15.39%

-10.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.91%

21.49%

-14.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.41%

21.55%

-14.14%

FIQDX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIQDX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIQDX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

FIQDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than FSPGX's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIQDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z
4.19%4.75%4.88%5.38%7.39%5.44%2.29%3.17%8.46%0.00%
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.32%0.34%0.37%0.73%0.86%2.22%1.76%1.04%1.32%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIQDX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSPGX has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to FIQDX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQDX dropped -19.98% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

FIQDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIQDX and FSPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer