PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIQAX vs. TSAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIQAX vs. TSAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class Z (FIQAX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FIQAX having a 10.39% return and TSAIX slightly higher at 10.64%.


FIQAX

1D
0.43%
1M
3.87%
YTD
10.39%
6M
11.21%
1Y
23.55%
3Y*
14.77%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*

TSAIX

1D
0.62%
1M
4.96%
YTD
10.64%
6M
11.38%
1Y
26.69%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIQAX vs. TSAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIQAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class Z
10.39%16.70%9.53%14.82%-16.13%12.00%16.13%20.73%-10.66%
TSAIX
TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund
10.64%20.04%15.46%22.72%-19.57%17.10%19.69%27.97%-11.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FIQAX and TSAIX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

0.97

The correlation between FIQAX and TSAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIQAX vs. TSAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIQAX
FIQAX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FIQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

TSAIX
TSAIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TSAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
TSAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIQAX vs. TSAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class Z (FIQAX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIQAXTSAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.38

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

2.65

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.85

11.60

+3.24

FIQAX vs. TSAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIQAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the TSAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIQAX and TSAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIQAXTSAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.11

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.60

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.72

+0.01

Drawdowns

FIQAX vs. TSAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIQAX drawdown since its inception was -24.37%, smaller than the maximum TSAIX drawdown of -34.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQAX and TSAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIQAXTSAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.37%

-34.58%

+10.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

-10.28%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.95%

-17.29%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.36%

-28.28%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-4.92%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

2.34%

-0.73%

Volatility

FIQAX vs. TSAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class Z (FIQAX) is 3.01%, while TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX) has a volatility of 3.72%. This indicates that FIQAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIQAXTSAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

3.72%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.49%

10.26%

-2.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.14%

12.92%

-3.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.80%

16.25%

-5.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.11%

17.65%

-5.54%

FIQAX vs. TSAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIQAX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than TSAIX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIQAX vs. TSAIX - Dividend Comparison

FIQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%, less than TSAIX's 6.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIQAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class Z
5.41%5.97%3.39%2.01%4.53%2.65%1.94%4.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSAIX
TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund
6.67%7.38%2.94%1.81%9.27%11.82%5.59%5.71%5.71%1.13%4.12%7.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FIQAX and TSAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TSAIX has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to FIQAX (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQAX dropped -24.37% vs TSAIX's -34.58%.

FIQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIQAX and TSAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer