PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIPFX vs. JLKYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FIPFX vs. JLKYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class (FIPFX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FIPFX vs. JLKYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIPFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class
-1.55%21.40%14.15%19.91%-18.22%15.93%16.46%26.02%-7.28%20.54%
JLKYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
-1.36%20.04%15.41%18.53%-18.04%18.38%16.13%25.07%-8.32%17.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIPFX achieves a -1.55% return, which is significantly lower than JLKYX's -1.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FIPFX having a 10.68% annualized return and JLKYX not far behind at 10.33%.


FIPFX

1D
2.70%
1M
-5.46%
YTD
-1.55%
6M
1.03%
1Y
19.20%
3Y*
15.22%
5Y*
8.05%
10Y*
10.68%

JLKYX

1D
2.78%
1M
-5.68%
YTD
-1.36%
6M
1.09%
1Y
19.55%
3Y*
15.25%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
10.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FIPFX vs. JLKYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIPFX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than JLKYX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FIPFX vs. JLKYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIPFX
FIPFX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FIPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FIPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

JLKYX
JLKYX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JLKYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLKYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLKYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
JLKYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLKYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIPFX vs. JLKYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class (FIPFX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIPFXJLKYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.29

1.22

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.87

1.78

+0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

1.74

+0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.32

8.09

+0.22

FIPFX vs. JLKYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIPFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the JLKYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIPFX and JLKYX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIPFXJLKYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

1.22

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.54

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.64

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.58

+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between FIPFX and JLKYX is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FIPFX vs. JLKYX - Dividend Comparison

FIPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than JLKYX's 3.66% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIPFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class
2.01%1.97%2.00%1.94%2.02%1.93%1.95%15.16%2.28%2.05%2.09%2.00%
JLKYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
3.66%3.61%1.77%2.16%8.08%5.71%3.88%8.54%10.69%4.33%3.23%1.75%

Drawdowns

FIPFX vs. JLKYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIPFX drawdown since its inception was -30.71%, smaller than the maximum JLKYX drawdown of -32.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIPFX and JLKYX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FIPFXJLKYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.71%

-32.55%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.81%

-11.59%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.20%

-25.75%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.71%

-32.55%

+1.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.51%

-6.63%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-4.71%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

2.49%

-0.12%

Volatility

FIPFX vs. JLKYX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class (FIPFX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) have volatilities of 5.83% and 5.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FIPFXJLKYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.83%

5.95%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.08%

9.49%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.37%

16.39%

-1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.32%

15.16%

-0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.12%

16.16%

-1.04%