PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIPDX vs. FNILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIPDX vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIPDX achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than FNILX's 10.70% return.


FIPDX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.11%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.22%
1Y
4.77%
3Y*
4.04%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*
2.66%

FNILX

1D
-0.77%
1M
4.37%
YTD
10.70%
6M
10.49%
1Y
27.60%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
13.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIPDX vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIPDX
Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
1.55%6.90%2.00%3.77%-12.09%5.94%10.90%8.32%-0.49%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
10.70%17.81%25.47%27.45%-19.37%26.67%21.13%31.79%-13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FIPDX and FNILX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018

0.08

The correlation between FIPDX and FNILX shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.19 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIPDX vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIPDX
FIPDX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FIPDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIPDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIPDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FIPDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIPDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FNILX
FNILX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FNILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNILX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FNILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNILX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIPDX vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIPDXFNILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.42

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

3.08

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.78

14.10

-6.32

FIPDX vs. FNILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIPDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the FNILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIPDX and FNILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIPDXFNILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

2.33

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.80

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.76

-0.34

Drawdowns

FIPDX vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIPDX drawdown since its inception was -14.32%, smaller than the maximum FNILX drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIPDX and FNILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIPDXFNILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.32%

-33.76%

+19.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.94%

-9.01%

+7.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.49%

-19.08%

+14.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.32%

-25.40%

+11.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.77%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.47%

-5.37%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

1.97%

-1.31%

Volatility

FIPDX vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX) is 0.90%, while Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) has a volatility of 3.00%. This indicates that FIPDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIPDXFNILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

3.00%

-2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.28%

9.01%

-6.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.36%

11.96%

-8.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.97%

17.25%

-11.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.37%

20.04%

-14.67%

FIPDX vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIPDX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FIPDX vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison

FIPDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than FNILX's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIPDX
Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
3.79%4.18%3.75%3.56%8.87%4.76%1.24%1.97%2.26%1.29%1.34%0.38%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
0.91%1.01%1.09%1.34%1.53%0.95%1.20%1.17%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIPDX and FNILX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNILX has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to FIPDX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIPDX dropped -14.32% vs FNILX's -33.76%.

FNILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIPDX and FNILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer