PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIOFX vs. JRLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIOFX vs. JRLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Fund Investor Class (FIOFX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FIOFX having a 11.49% return and JRLVX slightly higher at 11.84%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FIOFX having a 12.16% annualized return and JRLVX not far behind at 11.66%.


FIOFX

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.72%
YTD
11.49%
6M
10.89%
1Y
26.36%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
12.16%

JRLVX

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.78%
YTD
11.84%
6M
11.18%
1Y
26.10%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*
11.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIOFX vs. JRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIOFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Fund Investor Class
11.49%21.40%14.14%19.90%-18.21%15.95%16.43%25.96%-7.24%20.59%
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
11.84%19.25%14.50%18.00%-18.06%18.45%16.23%25.03%-8.29%17.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FIOFX and JRLVX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2013

0.99

The correlation between FIOFX and JRLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIOFX vs. JRLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIOFX
FIOFX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FIOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FIOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

JRLVX
JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIOFX vs. JRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Fund Investor Class (FIOFX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIOFXJRLVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

3.19

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.35

13.84

-0.49

FIOFX vs. JRLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIOFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the JRLVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIOFX and JRLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIOFX vs. JRLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIOFX drawdown since its inception was -30.72%, smaller than the maximum JRLVX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIOFX and JRLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIOFXJRLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.72%

-32.53%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-8.50%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.75%

-15.27%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.22%

-25.64%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.72%

-32.53%

+1.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-0.43%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-4.54%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

1.96%

+0.10%

Volatility

FIOFX vs. JRLVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Fund Investor Class (FIOFX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) have volatilities of 4.88% and 4.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIOFXJRLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

4.71%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

9.85%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.24%

11.98%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.48%

14.88%

-0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.20%

16.03%

-0.83%

FIOFX vs. JRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIOFX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than JRLVX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FIOFX vs. JRLVX - Dividend Comparison

FIOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than JRLVX's 3.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIOFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Fund Investor Class
1.91%2.03%2.01%1.95%2.03%1.92%1.95%14.88%2.26%1.89%2.00%2.01%
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
3.18%3.55%1.89%2.24%8.03%6.00%4.26%8.99%10.96%4.29%3.40%1.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FIOFX and JRLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIOFX has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to JRLVX (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIOFX dropped -30.72% vs JRLVX's -32.53%.

JRLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIOFX and JRLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer