FINX.L vs. QYLP.L
FINX.L (Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Acc) and QYLP.L (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - FINX.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Acc, while QYLP.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FINX.L returned 2.93%/yr vs 12.73%/yr for QYLP.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FINX.L vs. QYLP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FINX.L is traded in USD, while QYLP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the QYLP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FINX.L achieves a -11.90% return, which is significantly lower than QYLP.L's 8.42% return.
FINX.L
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 4.33%
- 6M
- -11.90%
- YTD
- -11.90%
- 1Y
- -23.33%
- 3Y*
- 2.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLP.L
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 7.56%
- YTD
- 8.42%
- 1Y
- 20.55%
- 3Y*
- 12.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FINX.L vs. QYLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FINX.L Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Acc | -11.90% | -5.95% | 22.04% | 36.70% | -3.10% |
QYLP.L Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP | 8.42% | 5.63% | 22.43% | 22.73% | -17.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between FINX.L and QYLP.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2022 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FINX.L vs. QYLP.L — Risk / Return Rank
FINX.L
QYLP.L
FINX.L vs. QYLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Acc (FINX.L) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP (QYLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FINX.L | QYLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.39 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 4.43 | -5.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 18.40 | -19.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FINX.L vs. QYLP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FINX.L drawdown since its inception was -62.08%, which is greater than QYLP.L's maximum drawdown of -19.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINX.L and QYLP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FINX.L | QYLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.08% | -19.69% | -42.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.51% | -4.62% | -31.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.51% | -19.69% | -16.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.48% | -0.33% | -45.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.53% | -3.92% | -40.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.04% | 1.11% | +20.93% |
Volatility
FINX.L vs. QYLP.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Acc (FINX.L) has a higher volatility of 8.64% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP (QYLP.L) at 4.92%. This indicates that FINX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FINX.L | QYLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.64% | 4.92% | +3.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.04% | 8.51% | +15.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.41% | 9.98% | +19.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.30% | 14.73% | +16.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.30% | 14.73% | +16.57% |
Dividends
FINX.L vs. QYLP.L - Dividend Comparison
FINX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FINX.L Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLP.L Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF Dis GBP | 11.54% | 11.71% | 10.64% | 10.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FINX.L and QYLP.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FINX.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while QYLP.L is Nasdaq-100. FINX.L tracks Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD Acc, while QYLP.L tracks Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite Index.
Find the right allocation for FINX.L and QYLP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer