FINW.L vs. XUFB.L
FINW.L (Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS) and XUFB.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D) are both Financials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, from Amundi and DWS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FINW.L returned 11.72%/yr vs 9.72%/yr for XUFB.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FINW.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XUFB.L.
Performance
FINW.L vs. XUFB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FINW.L is traded in USD, while XUFB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XUFB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FINW.L achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly higher than XUFB.L's -0.76% return.
FINW.L
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 4.48%
- 1Y
- 13.90%
- 3Y*
- 23.94%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
XUFB.L
- 1D
- 4.43%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- -0.76%
- 6M
- 3.26%
- 1Y
- 26.35%
- 3Y*
- 30.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.72%
- 10Y*
- —
FINW.L vs. XUFB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FINW.L Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS | 0.26% | 29.01% | 26.29% | 16.30% | -9.87% | 28.61% | -2.86% | 25.04% | -4.34% |
XUFB.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D | -0.76% | 32.71% | 37.68% | 10.76% | -19.78% | 36.29% | -15.40% | 39.90% | -8.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between FINW.L and XUFB.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2018 | 0.79 |
The correlation between FINW.L and XUFB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
FINW.L vs. XUFB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FINW.L
XUFB.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
FINW.L
XUFB.L
-
Financial Services
FINW.L
XUFB.L
Consumer Cyclical
FINW.L
XUFB.L
-
Consumer Defensive
FINW.L
XUFB.L
-
Communication Services
FINW.L
XUFB.L
-
Industrials
FINW.L
XUFB.L
-
Healthcare
FINW.L
XUFB.L
-
Basic Materials
FINW.L
XUFB.L
-
Energy
FINW.L
XUFB.L
-
Utilities
FINW.L
XUFB.L
-
Real Estate
FINW.L
XUFB.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FINW.L vs. XUFB.L — Risk / Return Rank
FINW.L
XUFB.L
FINW.L vs. XUFB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS (FINW.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D (XUFB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FINW.L | XUFB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.23 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 1.64 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.21 | 4.36 | -0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FINW.L | XUFB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 1.28 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.39 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.45 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
FINW.L vs. XUFB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FINW.L drawdown since its inception was -43.64%, smaller than the maximum XUFB.L drawdown of -48.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINW.L and XUFB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FINW.L | XUFB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.64% | -48.15% | +4.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.98% | -16.03% | +5.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.81% | -25.61% | +9.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.31% | -39.96% | +12.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -5.03% | +3.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.59% | -14.90% | +7.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 6.02% | -2.73% |
Volatility
FINW.L vs. XUFB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS (FINW.L) is 4.16%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D (XUFB.L) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that FINW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUFB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FINW.L | XUFB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 6.99% | -2.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 16.34% | -5.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.26% | 20.50% | -6.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.85% | 25.19% | -7.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 30.17% | -10.93% |
FINW.L vs. XUFB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FINW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XUFB.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
FINW.L vs. XUFB.L - Dividend Comparison
FINW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUFB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FINW.L Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUFB.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D | 1.76% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 2.54% | 3.43% | 1.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FINW.L and XUFB.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUFB.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUFB.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FINW.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FINW.L and 0.12% for XUFB.L.
Find the right allocation for FINW.L and XUFB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer