PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FINW.L vs. XDWF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FINW.L vs. XDWF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS (FINW.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FINW.L vs. XDWF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FINW.L
Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS
-6.22%29.01%26.29%16.30%-9.87%28.61%-2.86%25.04%-17.55%23.46%
XDWF.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C
-6.61%30.23%26.41%15.97%-10.11%28.49%-3.31%26.39%-17.97%23.65%
Different Trading Currencies

FINW.L is traded in USD, while XDWF.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XDWF.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FINW.L achieves a -6.22% return, which is significantly higher than XDWF.DE's -6.61% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FINW.L having a 11.86% annualized return and XDWF.DE not far ahead at 11.91%.


FINW.L

1D
-0.64%
1M
-2.73%
YTD
-6.22%
6M
-1.35%
1Y
17.31%
3Y*
21.77%
5Y*
12.40%
10Y*
11.86%

XDWF.DE

1D
-0.69%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
-6.61%
6M
-1.42%
1Y
17.57%
3Y*
21.95%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
11.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FINW.L vs. XDWF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FINW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWF.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FINW.L vs. XDWF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FINW.L
FINW.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FINW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FINW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FINW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FINW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FINW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWF.DE
XDWF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XDWF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FINW.L vs. XDWF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS (FINW.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FINW.LXDWF.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.73

0.71

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.09

1.07

+0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.15

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

1.57

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.60

5.56

+0.04

FINW.L vs. XDWF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FINW.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is comparable to the XDWF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FINW.L and XDWF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FINW.LXDWF.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

0.71

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.69

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.61

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.59

-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between FINW.L and XDWF.DE is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FINW.L vs. XDWF.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FINW.L nor XDWF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FINW.L vs. XDWF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FINW.L drawdown since its inception was -43.64%, roughly equal to the maximum XDWF.DE drawdown of -43.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINW.L and XDWF.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FINW.LXDWF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.64%

-42.06%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.98%

-9.65%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.31%

-19.74%

-7.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.64%

-42.06%

-1.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.95%

-6.79%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.65%

-6.11%

-1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

3.01%

+0.08%

Volatility

FINW.L vs. XDWF.DE - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS (FINW.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWF.DE) have volatilities of 5.76% and 5.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FINW.LXDWF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

5.52%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.55%

10.78%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.82%

18.77%

-0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.80%

17.79%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.21%

19.52%

-0.31%