FINW.L vs. UIFS.L
FINW.L (Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS) and UIFS.L (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Financials Equities funds - FINW.L tracks the MSCI World/Financials NR USD while UIFS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FINW.L returned 12.08%/yr vs 12.22%/yr for UIFS.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FINW.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for UIFS.L.
Performance
FINW.L vs. UIFS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FINW.L is traded in USD, while UIFS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UIFS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FINW.L achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly higher than UIFS.L's -5.05% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FINW.L having a 12.08% annualized return and UIFS.L not far ahead at 12.22%.
FINW.L
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 4.48%
- 1Y
- 13.90%
- 3Y*
- 23.94%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
UIFS.L
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- -5.05%
- 6M
- -1.92%
- 1Y
- 3.62%
- 3Y*
- 18.41%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
FINW.L vs. UIFS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FINW.L Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS | 0.26% | 29.01% | 26.29% | 16.30% | -9.87% | 28.61% | -2.86% | 25.04% | -17.55% | 23.46% |
UIFS.L iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -5.05% | 15.15% | 30.03% | 11.72% | -11.09% | 36.82% | -3.73% | 32.15% | -14.53% | 22.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between FINW.L and UIFS.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.87 |
The correlation between FINW.L and UIFS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
FINW.L vs. UIFS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FINW.L
UIFS.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
FINW.L
UIFS.L
Financial Services
FINW.L
UIFS.L
Consumer Cyclical
FINW.L
UIFS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
FINW.L
UIFS.L
-
Communication Services
FINW.L
UIFS.L
-
Industrials
FINW.L
UIFS.L
Healthcare
FINW.L
UIFS.L
-
Basic Materials
FINW.L
UIFS.L
-
Energy
FINW.L
UIFS.L
-
Utilities
FINW.L
UIFS.L
-
Real Estate
FINW.L
UIFS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FINW.L vs. UIFS.L — Risk / Return Rank
FINW.L
UIFS.L
FINW.L vs. UIFS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS (FINW.L) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FINW.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.05 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 0.25 | +1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.21 | 0.64 | +3.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FINW.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 0.25 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.43 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.58 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.54 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
FINW.L vs. UIFS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FINW.L drawdown since its inception was -43.64%, roughly equal to the maximum UIFS.L drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINW.L and UIFS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FINW.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.64% | -42.38% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.98% | -14.24% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.81% | -17.16% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.31% | -26.75% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.64% | -42.38% | -1.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -7.04% | +5.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.59% | -7.89% | +0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 5.63% | -2.34% |
Volatility
FINW.L vs. UIFS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS (FINW.L) is 4.16%, while iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that FINW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UIFS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FINW.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 4.42% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 10.77% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.26% | 14.19% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.85% | 18.63% | -0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 20.89% | -1.65% |
FINW.L vs. UIFS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FINW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than UIFS.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FINW.L vs. UIFS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FINW.L nor UIFS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FINW.L and UIFS.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UIFS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIFS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FINW.L.
FINW.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while UIFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FINW.L and 0.15% for UIFS.L.
Find the right allocation for FINW.L and UIFS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer