PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FINW.L vs. MWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FINW.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS (FINW.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FINW.L is traded in USD, while MWRD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MWRD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


FINW.L

1D
1.90%
1M
1.63%
YTD
0.26%
6M
4.48%
1Y
13.90%
3Y*
23.94%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
12.08%

MWRD.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FINW.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FINW.L
Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS
0.26%29.01%26.29%16.30%-9.87%28.61%-2.86%25.04%-17.55%11.44%
MWRD.L
Amundi Index MSCI World
0.00%0.00%-1.64%23.69%-18.69%22.97%15.27%28.71%-9.87%10.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FINW.L and MWRD.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017

0.62

The correlation between FINW.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FINW.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FINW.L
MWRD.L

Technology

40.1%
24.7%

Financial Services

14.4%
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
6.7%

Communication Services

7.8%
7.5%

Industrials

5.2%
10.6%

Healthcare

3.9%
12.4%

Basic Materials

3.6%
3.8%

Energy

2.6%
4.4%

Utilities

0.7%
2.4%

Real Estate

0.5%
2.4%

Technology

FINW.L
40.1%
MWRD.L
24.7%

Financial Services

FINW.L
14.4%
MWRD.L
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FINW.L
11.1%
MWRD.L
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

FINW.L
10.1%
MWRD.L
6.7%

Communication Services

FINW.L
7.8%
MWRD.L
7.5%

Industrials

FINW.L
5.2%
MWRD.L
10.6%

Healthcare

FINW.L
3.9%
MWRD.L
12.4%

Basic Materials

FINW.L
3.6%
MWRD.L
3.8%

Energy

FINW.L
2.6%
MWRD.L
4.4%

Utilities

FINW.L
0.7%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Real Estate

FINW.L
0.5%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FINW.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FINW.L
FINW.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FINW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FINW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FINW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FINW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FINW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

MWRD.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FINW.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS (FINW.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FINW.LMWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.21

FINW.L vs. MWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FINW.LMWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

Drawdowns

FINW.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FINW.LMWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

Volatility

FINW.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FINW.LMWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.24%

FINW.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FINW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FINW.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FINW.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FINW.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FINW.L.

FINW.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while MWRD.L is Global Equities. FINW.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while MWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FINW.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FINW.L and MWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer