PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FINV vs. PLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FINV vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FinVolution Group (FINV) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FINV achieves a 2.28% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -27.99% return.


FINV

1D
1.62%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
2.28%
6M
1.69%
1Y
-39.97%
3Y*
8.84%
5Y*
-4.69%
10Y*

PLTR

1D
-2.36%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
-27.99%
6M
-30.28%
1Y
-5.33%
3Y*
99.99%
5Y*
39.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FINV vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FINV
FinVolution Group
2.28%-20.07%45.47%4.39%6.39%89.23%42.78%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-27.99%135.03%340.48%167.45%-64.74%-22.68%135.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FINV and PLTR is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FINV:

$1.29B

PLTR:

$329.05B

EPS

FINV:

CN¥8.34

PLTR:

$0.89

PE Ratio

FINV:

4.09

PLTR:

144.03

PEG Ratio

FINV:

1.43

PLTR:

0.84

PS Ratio

FINV:

0.68

PLTR:

62.90

PB Ratio

FINV:

0.54

PLTR:

38.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

FINV:

CN¥13.24B

PLTR:

$5.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FINV:

CN¥10.21B

PLTR:

$4.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

FINV:

CN¥2.61B

PLTR:

$2.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FINV vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FINV
FINV Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FINV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FINV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FINV Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FINV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FINV Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FINV vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FinVolution Group (FINV) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FINVPLTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.03

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

-0.14

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.96

-0.25

-0.71

FINV vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FINV Sharpe Ratio is -0.82, which is lower than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FINV and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FINV vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FINV drawdown since its inception was -89.76%, which is greater than PLTR's maximum drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINV and PLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FINVPLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.76%

-84.62%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.42%

-38.22%

-18.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.42%

-40.61%

-15.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.54%

-79.14%

+8.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.54%

-38.22%

-11.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.09%

-40.27%

-13.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.69%

21.23%

+20.46%

Volatility

FINV vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

FinVolution Group (FINV) has a higher volatility of 19.10% compared to Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) at 17.16%. This indicates that FINV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FINVPLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.10%

17.16%

+1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.29%

38.32%

-5.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.91%

50.83%

-1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.99%

65.44%

-15.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.75%

69.75%

+2.00%

Dividends

FINV vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

FINV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FINV
FinVolution Group
6.08%5.30%3.49%4.39%4.13%3.45%4.49%7.17%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FINV vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FinVolution Group and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
3.19B
1.63B
(FINV) Total Revenue
(PLTR) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FINV values in CNY, PLTR values in USD

FINV vs. PLTR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FinVolution Group and Palantir Technologies Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%20222023202420252026
76.3%
86.8%
Portfolio components
FINV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FinVolution Group reported a gross profit of 2.43B and revenue of 3.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.3%.

PLTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.

FINV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FinVolution Group reported an operating income of 526.49M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.

PLTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.

FINV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FinVolution Group reported a net income of 412.55M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.

PLTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 870.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 53.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FINV and PLTR have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FINV has higher volatility (19.10%) compared to PLTR (17.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FINV dropped -89.76% vs PLTR's -84.62%.

PLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FINV and PLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer