FINT vs. ACLO
FINT (Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF) and ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FINT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Frontier, while ACLO is a CLO fund actively managed by TCW. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FINT returned 31.76% vs 5.31% for ACLO. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. FINT charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACLO.
Performance
FINT vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FINT achieves a 14.98% return, which is significantly higher than ACLO's 2.21% return.
FINT
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 14.98%
- 6M
- 17.18%
- 1Y
- 31.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACLO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 5.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FINT vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FINT Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF | 14.98% | 29.12% | -0.15% |
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 2.21% | 5.32% | 0.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between FINT and ACLO is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FINT vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank
FINT
ACLO
FINT vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF (FINT) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FINT | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -11.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 3.41 | -1.99 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 19.90 | -16.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.35 | 164.37 | -152.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FINT | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 7.29 | -5.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.99 | 5.10 | -3.11 |
Drawdowns
FINT vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FINT drawdown since its inception was -13.64%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINT and ACLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FINT | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.64% | -1.01% | -12.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -0.27% | -9.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | 0.00% | -0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.54% | -0.05% | -1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 0.03% | +2.55% |
Volatility
FINT vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison
Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF (FINT) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) at 0.14%. This indicates that FINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FINT | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 0.14% | +4.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.83% | 0.57% | +11.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.98% | 0.73% | +13.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 1.08% | +14.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 1.08% | +14.82% |
FINT vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FINT has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
FINT vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison
FINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than ACLO's 4.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 4.91% | 4.87% | 0.59% |
FINT Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF | 1.91% | 2.20% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FINT and ACLO have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FINT has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to ACLO (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FINT dropped -13.64% vs ACLO's -1.01%.
On 1-year performance, FINT leads with 31.76% vs 5.31% for ACLO. On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FINT has performed better with a 31.76% return vs 5.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FINT.
ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 1.91% for FINT.
FINT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Frontier and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for FINT and 0.20% for ACLO.
ACLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.29 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FINT and ACLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer