FINN.NEO vs. CYH.TO
FINN.NEO (Fidelity Global Innovators ETF) and CYH.TO (iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Global Equities funds. FINN.NEO is actively managed, while CYH.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FINN.NEO returned 43.00%/yr vs 16.18%/yr for CYH.TO. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FINN.NEO charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for CYH.TO.
Performance
FINN.NEO vs. CYH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FINN.NEO achieves a 40.98% return, which is significantly higher than CYH.TO's 11.38% return.
FINN.NEO
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- 6M
- 33.95%
- YTD
- 40.98%
- 1Y
- 58.67%
- 3Y*
- 43.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CYH.TO
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 7.95%
- YTD
- 11.38%
- 1Y
- 20.25%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 7.40%
FINN.NEO vs. CYH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FINN.NEO Fidelity Global Innovators ETF | 40.98% | 20.61% | 58.65% | 21.40% |
CYH.TO iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 11.38% | 18.78% | 12.28% | 7.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between FINN.NEO and CYH.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FINN.NEO vs. CYH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FINN.NEO
CYH.TO
FINN.NEO vs. CYH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Innovators ETF (FINN.NEO) and iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FINN.NEO | CYH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.36 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.94 | 3.84 | +1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.51 | 13.96 | +1.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FINN.NEO vs. CYH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FINN.NEO drawdown since its inception was -25.66%, smaller than the maximum CYH.TO drawdown of -61.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINN.NEO and CYH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FINN.NEO | CYH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.66% | -61.50% | +35.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.94% | -5.34% | -6.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -12.12% | -13.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.91% | -0.63% | -2.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.97% | -10.16% | +6.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.79% | 1.47% | +2.32% |
Volatility
FINN.NEO vs. CYH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Global Innovators ETF (FINN.NEO) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO) at 3.30%. This indicates that FINN.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CYH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FINN.NEO | CYH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.08% | 3.30% | +2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.03% | 7.56% | +12.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.62% | 10.23% | +14.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.37% | 13.41% | +8.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.37% | 17.11% | +5.26% |
FINN.NEO vs. CYH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FINN.NEO has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than CYH.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
FINN.NEO vs. CYH.TO - Dividend Comparison
FINN.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CYH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYH.TO iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 3.28% | 3.77% | 4.33% | 4.68% | 4.72% | 3.89% | 4.51% | 4.18% | 3.98% | 3.03% | 3.39% | 3.84% |
FINN.NEO Fidelity Global Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FINN.NEO and CYH.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CYH.TO is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CYH.TO is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for FINN.NEO.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for FINN.NEO and 0.66% for CYH.TO.
Find the right allocation for FINN.NEO and CYH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer