FIMVX vs. NCBVX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FIMVX (Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund) and NCBVX (PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FIMVX returned 9.52%/yr vs 9.14%/yr for NCBVX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FIMVX charges 0.05%/yr vs 1.95%/yr for NCBVX.

Performance

FIMVX vs. NCBVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund (FIMVX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund (NCBVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIMVX achieves a 17.15% return, which is significantly lower than NCBVX's 18.14% return.

FIMVX

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 3.74%
• YTD: 17.15%
• 6M: 15.81%
• 1Y: 28.30%
• 3Y*: 17.86%
• 5Y*: 9.52%
• 10Y*: —

NCBVX

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 4.08%
• YTD: 18.14%
• 6M: 16.46%
• 1Y: 31.81%
• 3Y*: 17.86%
• 5Y*: 9.14%
• 10Y*: 8.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIMVX vs. NCBVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FIMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund	17.15%	11.01%	13.02%	12.75%	-12.08%	28.21%	4.74%	7.42%
NCBVX PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund	18.14%	11.86%	10.49%	10.40%	-10.18%	33.13%	-7.31%	5.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FIMVX and NCBVX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019	0.96

The correlation between FIMVX and NCBVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIMVX vs. NCBVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIMVX

FIMVX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FIMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FIMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
FIMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FIMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FIMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

NCBVX

NCBVX Risk / Return Rank: 85
NCBVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
NCBVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
NCBVX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
NCBVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
NCBVX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIMVX vs. NCBVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund (FIMVX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund (NCBVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIMVX	NCBVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	2.50	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	3.53	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.44	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.92	5.27	-1.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.69	19.01	-4.32

FIMVX vs. NCBVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIMVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the NCBVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIMVX and NCBVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIMVX vs. NCBVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIMVX drawdown since its inception was -43.61%, smaller than the maximum NCBVX drawdown of -60.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIMVX and NCBVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIMVX	NCBVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.61%	-60.64%	+17.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.52%	-6.31%	-1.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.40%	-21.27%	+0.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.23%	-23.15%	+1.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	0.00%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.38%	-9.08%	+2.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	1.75%	+0.26%

Volatility

FIMVX vs. NCBVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund (FIMVX) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund (NCBVX) at 4.00%. This indicates that FIMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NCBVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIMVX	NCBVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.24%	4.00%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.02%	9.82%	+0.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.55%	13.33%	+0.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.34%	18.78%	-1.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.80%	22.68%	-0.88%

FIMVX vs. NCBVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIMVX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than NCBVX's 1.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIMVX vs. NCBVX - Dividend Comparison

FIMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than NCBVX's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund	2.12%	2.48%	4.44%	1.89%	2.75%	5.62%	1.23%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NCBVX PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund	0.58%	0.68%	1.03%	1.59%	1.17%	0.74%	1.60%	1.93%	13.70%	6.69%	2.83%	7.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIMVX and NCBVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, FIMVX and NCBVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FIMVX or NCBVX?

FIMVX has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to NCBVX (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIMVX dropped -43.61% vs NCBVX's -60.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NCBVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.