FILDX vs. STBFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FILDX (Frost Low Duration Bond Fund) and STBFX (Sextant Short Term Bond Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FILDX charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for STBFX.

Performance

FILDX vs. STBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frost Low Duration Bond Fund (FILDX) and Sextant Short Term Bond Fund (STBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FILDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.11%
• YTD: 0.51%
• 6M: 0.76%
• 1Y: 3.85%
• 3Y*: 4.84%
• 5Y*: 2.11%
• 10Y*: 2.23%

STBFX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FILDX vs. STBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FILDX Frost Low Duration Bond Fund	0.51%	5.26%	4.87%	5.71%	-4.80%	-0.35%	4.25%	3.22%	1.83%	1.77%
STBFX Sextant Short Term Bond Fund	0.28%	4.92%	3.87%	3.79%	-4.16%	-1.09%	3.42%	4.03%	1.09%	0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FILDX and STBFX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2001	0.55

The correlation between FILDX and STBFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FILDX vs. STBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FILDX

FILDX Risk / Return Rank: 63
FILDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FILDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FILDX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FILDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FILDX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FILDX vs. STBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frost Low Duration Bond Fund (FILDX) and Sextant Short Term Bond Fund (STBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FILDX	STBFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.12	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FILDX	STBFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FILDX	STBFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.10%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-7.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.60%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.31%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FILDX	STBFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.23%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.76%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.17%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.83%	—	—

FILDX vs. STBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FILDX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than STBFX's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FILDX vs. STBFX - Dividend Comparison

FILDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than STBFX's 2.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FILDX Frost Low Duration Bond Fund	4.22%	3.61%	4.45%	3.65%	1.86%	1.98%	2.02%	2.18%	1.90%	1.76%	1.63%	1.35%
STBFX Sextant Short Term Bond Fund	2.61%	3.17%	2.77%	1.84%	1.04%	1.07%	1.60%	1.75%	1.47%	1.30%	1.06%	1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FILDX and STBFX in my portfolio?

FILDX and STBFX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.