PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIKZX vs. WFSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIKZX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class Z (FIKZX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIKZX achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly lower than WFSPX's 11.69% return.


FIKZX

1D
0.38%
1M
3.32%
YTD
9.04%
6M
9.73%
1Y
20.80%
3Y*
14.09%
5Y*
7.04%
10Y*

WFSPX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.80%
YTD
11.69%
6M
11.72%
1Y
28.93%
3Y*
22.71%
5Y*
14.24%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIKZX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIKZX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class Z
9.04%15.04%11.18%13.17%-14.90%9.98%14.79%18.32%-6.94%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund
11.69%17.83%24.94%26.25%-18.14%28.63%18.43%31.45%-13.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FIKZX and WFSPX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2018

0.91

The correlation between FIKZX and WFSPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIKZX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIKZX
FIKZX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FIKZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

WFSPX
WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIKZX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class Z (FIKZX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIKZXWFSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.46

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

3.35

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.99

15.65

-0.66

FIKZX vs. WFSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIKZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the WFSPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIKZX and WFSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIKZXWFSPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

2.52

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.85

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.13

+0.70

Drawdowns

FIKZX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIKZX drawdown since its inception was -21.28%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKZX and WFSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIKZXWFSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.28%

-58.21%

+36.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

-8.90%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.23%

-18.74%

+9.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.48%

-24.51%

+4.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-12.77%

+8.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

1.90%

-0.50%

Volatility

FIKZX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class Z (FIKZX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) have volatilities of 2.68% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIKZXWFSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

2.82%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.51%

8.97%

-2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.92%

11.85%

-3.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.35%

16.88%

-7.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.23%

18.02%

-7.79%

FIKZX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIKZX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIKZX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison

FIKZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.04%, more than WFSPX's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIKZX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class Z
7.04%7.70%6.33%2.27%6.90%3.00%2.48%4.30%4.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund
1.56%1.72%1.41%1.50%2.02%1.82%1.66%1.99%2.00%1.62%2.37%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FIKZX and WFSPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

WFSPX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to FIKZX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIKZX dropped -21.28% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.

FIKZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIKZX and WFSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer