PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIKWX vs. VBAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIKWX vs. VBAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class Z (FIKWX) and Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIKWX achieves a 5.79% return, which is significantly lower than VBAIX's 7.02% return.


FIKWX

1D
0.30%
1M
0.37%
6M
4.56%
YTD
5.79%
1Y
12.05%
3Y*
9.62%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*

VBAIX

1D
0.59%
1M
0.95%
6M
5.55%
YTD
7.02%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
9.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIKWX vs. VBAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIKWX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class Z
5.79%11.32%6.32%9.85%-12.27%6.13%11.12%13.47%-4.14%
VBAIX
Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Institutional Shares
7.02%13.60%17.78%17.55%-16.87%14.20%16.40%21.79%-8.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FIKWX and VBAIX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2018

0.91

The correlation between FIKWX and VBAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIKWX vs. VBAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIKWX
FIKWX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FIKWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKWX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKWX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

VBAIX
VBAIX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VBAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VBAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIKWX vs. VBAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class Z (FIKWX) and Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIKWXVBAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.32

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

2.53

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.45

11.10

+0.35

FIKWX vs. VBAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIKWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the VBAIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIKWX and VBAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIKWX vs. VBAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIKWX drawdown since its inception was -16.51%, smaller than the maximum VBAIX drawdown of -35.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKWX and VBAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIKWXVBAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.51%

-35.82%

+19.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.32%

-5.84%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.00%

-11.57%

+5.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.51%

-21.52%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.36%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.36%

-4.41%

+1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

1.33%

-0.31%

Volatility

FIKWX vs. VBAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class Z (FIKWX) is 2.17%, while Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBAIX) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that FIKWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIKWXVBAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.17%

2.83%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.02%

6.75%

-1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.87%

8.37%

-2.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.59%

11.18%

-4.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.84%

11.24%

-4.40%

FIKWX vs. VBAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIKWX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VBAIX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIKWX vs. VBAIX - Dividend Comparison

FIKWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than VBAIX's 5.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIKWX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class Z
2.46%2.84%3.12%2.82%4.95%1.90%2.28%3.31%2.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VBAIX
Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Institutional Shares
5.33%6.01%8.01%4.36%2.84%3.20%2.65%2.29%2.33%1.96%2.10%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FIKWX and VBAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VBAIX has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to FIKWX (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIKWX dropped -16.51% vs VBAIX's -35.82%.

FIKWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIKWX and VBAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer