PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIKQX vs. VTBNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIKQX vs. VTBNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIKQX achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly higher than VTBNX's 0.54% return.


FIKQX

1D
0.42%
1M
0.89%
YTD
0.66%
6M
0.85%
1Y
4.34%
3Y*
4.45%
5Y*
0.33%
10Y*

VTBNX

1D
0.42%
1M
0.77%
YTD
0.54%
6M
0.77%
1Y
4.33%
3Y*
4.08%
5Y*
0.16%
10Y*
1.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIKQX vs. VTBNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIKQX
Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z
0.66%7.31%1.69%6.75%-13.97%-1.03%10.00%9.90%2.01%
VTBNX
Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund
0.54%7.18%1.32%5.68%-13.12%-1.82%7.39%8.71%2.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FIKQX and VTBNX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.95

The correlation between FIKQX and VTBNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIKQX vs. VTBNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIKQX
FIKQX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FIKQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKQX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKQX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

VTBNX
VTBNX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
VTBNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTBNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTBNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
VTBNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTBNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIKQX vs. VTBNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIKQXVTBNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.19

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

1.54

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.91

4.27

-0.36

FIKQX vs. VTBNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIKQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the VTBNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIKQX and VTBNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIKQX vs. VTBNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIKQX drawdown since its inception was -18.53%, roughly equal to the maximum VTBNX drawdown of -18.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKQX and VTBNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIKQXVTBNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.53%

-18.71%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.13%

-2.83%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.05%

-5.97%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.53%

-18.05%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-2.00%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.19%

-4.86%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

1.02%

+0.09%

Volatility

FIKQX vs. VTBNX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX) have volatilities of 1.15% and 1.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIKQXVTBNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

1.19%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.84%

2.89%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87%

3.89%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.00%

5.96%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.47%

4.93%

+0.54%

FIKQX vs. VTBNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIKQX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than VTBNX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIKQX vs. VTBNX - Dividend Comparison

FIKQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than VTBNX's 4.05% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FIKQX
Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z
4.00%3.97%4.08%3.65%2.05%1.44%4.90%2.83%1.07%0.00%0.00%
VTBNX
Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund
4.05%3.95%3.77%3.13%2.54%1.82%3.12%2.79%2.56%2.52%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FIKQX and VTBNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTBNX has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to FIKQX (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIKQX dropped -18.53% vs VTBNX's -18.71%.

FIKQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIKQX and VTBNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer