FIKGX vs. FTCHX
FIKGX (Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z) and FTCHX (Invesco Technology Fund) are both Technology Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FIKGX returned 39.33%/yr vs 15.35%/yr for FTCHX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIKGX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for FTCHX.
Performance
FIKGX vs. FTCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIKGX achieves a 74.74% return, which is significantly higher than FTCHX's 38.85% return.
FIKGX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 74.74%
- 6M
- 71.56%
- 1Y
- 131.85%
- 3Y*
- 57.08%
- 5Y*
- 39.33%
- 10Y*
- —
FTCHX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- 38.85%
- 6M
- 35.18%
- 1Y
- 60.86%
- 3Y*
- 36.74%
- 5Y*
- 15.35%
- 10Y*
- 20.88%
FIKGX vs. FTCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKGX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z | 74.74% | 45.43% | 35.88% | 75.75% | -34.81% | 58.07% | 44.21% | 64.45% | -11.11% |
FTCHX Invesco Technology Fund | 38.85% | 20.77% | 34.49% | 47.38% | -39.96% | 13.00% | 46.14% | 35.62% | -14.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIKGX and FTCHX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.87 |
The correlation between FIKGX and FTCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIKGX vs. FTCHX — Risk / Return Rank
FIKGX
FTCHX
FIKGX vs. FTCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX) and Invesco Technology Fund (FTCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIKGX | FTCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.33 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.27 | 4.32 | +4.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.34 | 14.74 | +18.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIKGX vs. FTCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIKGX drawdown since its inception was -45.98%, smaller than the maximum FTCHX drawdown of -87.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKGX and FTCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIKGX | FTCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.98% | -87.78% | +41.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.64% | -14.29% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.67% | -30.38% | -9.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.98% | -47.89% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.44% | -6.01% | -1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.77% | -36.36% | +26.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 4.18% | -0.12% |
Volatility
FIKGX vs. FTCHX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX) has a higher volatility of 19.71% compared to Invesco Technology Fund (FTCHX) at 15.05%. This indicates that FIKGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIKGX | FTCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.71% | 15.05% | +4.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.73% | 25.24% | +4.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.51% | 30.68% | +5.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.18% | 29.43% | +9.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.75% | 26.70% | +12.05% |
FIKGX vs. FTCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIKGX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FTCHX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIKGX vs. FTCHX - Dividend Comparison
FIKGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than FTCHX's 19.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKGX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z | 3.82% | 6.67% | 0.00% | 3.14% | 3.08% | 4.19% | 4.54% | 1.08% | 19.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTCHX Invesco Technology Fund | 19.13% | 26.56% | 13.59% | 0.80% | 1.60% | 27.66% | 7.06% | 9.58% | 9.01% | 4.14% | 6.98% | 6.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FIKGX and FTCHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FIKGX has higher volatility (19.71%) compared to FTCHX (15.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIKGX dropped -45.98% vs FTCHX's -87.78%.
FIKGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIKGX and FTCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer