PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIKBX vs. WFSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIKBX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FIKBX having a 10.09% return and WFSPX slightly higher at 10.11%.


FIKBX

1D
0.19%
1M
3.19%
6M
8.70%
YTD
10.09%
1Y
20.21%
3Y*
23.08%
5Y*
13.47%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.17%

WFSPX

1D
0.71%
1M
0.14%
6M
7.96%
YTD
10.11%
1Y
21.43%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
12.81%
10Y*
15.03%
ALL TIME*
16.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FIKBX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIKBX
Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z
10.09%15.36%32.80%14.47%-8.58%33.43%0.18%34.31%-11.43%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K
10.11%17.83%24.94%26.25%-18.14%28.63%18.43%31.45%-10.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FIKBX and WFSPX is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.71

The correlation between FIKBX and WFSPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIKBX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIKBX
FIKBX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FIKBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

WFSPX
WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIKBX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIKBXWFSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.27

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

2.20

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.90

9.44

-5.54

FIKBX vs. WFSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIKBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the WFSPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIKBX and WFSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIKBX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIKBX drawdown since its inception was -45.95%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKBX and WFSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIKBXWFSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.95%

-58.21%

+12.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.96%

-8.90%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.38%

-18.74%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.82%

-24.51%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-1.41%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.96%

-12.72%

+4.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.50%

2.07%

+2.43%

Volatility

FIKBX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX) at 3.52%. This indicates that FIKBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIKBXWFSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

3.52%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

10.11%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.18%

12.86%

+3.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.53%

16.99%

+3.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.76%

18.03%

+7.73%

FIKBX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIKBX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIKBX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison

FIKBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.46%, more than WFSPX's 1.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIKBX
Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z
6.46%7.11%5.04%2.48%6.20%4.43%2.78%1.59%4.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K
1.66%1.72%1.41%1.50%2.02%1.82%1.66%1.99%2.00%1.62%2.37%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIKBX and WFSPX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIKBX has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to WFSPX (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIKBX dropped -45.95% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.

WFSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIKBX and WFSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer