PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIJRX vs. FRQHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIJRX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class Z (FIJRX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIJRX achieves a 11.75% return, which is significantly higher than FRQHX's 3.89% return.


FIJRX

1D
-0.60%
1M
3.07%
YTD
11.75%
6M
13.13%
1Y
26.99%
3Y*
19.67%
5Y*
9.63%
10Y*

FRQHX

1D
-0.24%
1M
1.03%
YTD
3.89%
6M
4.19%
1Y
9.89%
3Y*
7.78%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIJRX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FIJRX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class Z
11.75%23.10%13.81%19.32%-17.81%16.07%17.70%9.51%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.89%10.01%4.68%8.75%-12.22%4.04%9.80%3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FIJRX and FRQHX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019

0.80

The correlation between FIJRX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIJRX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIJRX
FIJRX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FIJRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIJRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIJRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FIJRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIJRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQHX
FRQHX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FRQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIJRX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class Z (FIJRX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIJRXFRQHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.50

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

3.07

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.37

13.04

-0.67

FIJRX vs. FRQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIJRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the FRQHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIJRX and FRQHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIJRXFRQHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

2.52

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.53

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.80

-0.10

Drawdowns

FIJRX vs. FRQHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIJRX drawdown since its inception was -31.28%, which is greater than FRQHX's maximum drawdown of -16.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIJRX and FRQHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIJRXFRQHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.28%

-16.90%

-14.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-3.41%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.10%

-5.15%

-9.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.22%

-16.90%

-10.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-0.24%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-3.79%

-2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

0.80%

+1.43%

Volatility

FIJRX vs. FRQHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class Z (FIJRX) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) at 1.66%. This indicates that FIJRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIJRXFRQHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

1.66%

+2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.46%

3.42%

+7.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.64%

4.15%

+8.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.97%

5.56%

+9.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

5.76%

+11.19%

FIJRX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIJRX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIJRX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison

FIJRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.81%, more than FRQHX's 3.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FIJRX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class Z
6.81%6.09%1.84%1.68%11.24%9.69%5.48%7.26%2.51%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.30%3.20%3.20%2.95%5.25%6.22%3.70%2.57%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIJRX and FRQHX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIJRX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to FRQHX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIJRX dropped -31.28% vs FRQHX's -16.90%.

FRQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIJRX and FRQHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer