FIJDX vs. FGADX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FIJDX (Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z) and FGADX (Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class) are both Gold funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FIJDX returned 15.05%/yr vs 19.62%/yr for FGADX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIJDX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for FGADX.

Performance

FIJDX vs. FGADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z (FIJDX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FIJDX having a -10.74% return and FGADX slightly lower at -11.08%.

FIJDX

• 1D: -4.33%
• 1M: -15.15%
• YTD: -10.74%
• 6M: -14.51%
• 1Y: 40.06%
• 3Y*: 36.46%
• 5Y*: 15.05%
• 10Y*: —

FGADX

• 1D: -4.61%
• 1M: -16.98%
• YTD: -11.08%
• 6M: -14.13%
• 1Y: 61.98%
• 3Y*: 47.76%
• 5Y*: 19.62%
• 10Y*: 13.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIJDX vs. FGADX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FIJDX Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z	-10.74%	143.25%	15.10%	-0.26%	-13.32%	-10.33%	27.00%	35.74%	4.09%
FGADX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class	-11.08%	197.29%	17.98%	2.20%	-23.24%	-3.76%	44.60%	51.87%	-0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FIJDX and FGADX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018	0.94

The correlation between FIJDX and FGADX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIJDX vs. FGADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIJDX

FIJDX Risk / Return Rank: 16
FIJDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
FIJDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
FIJDX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FIJDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
FIJDX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

FGADX

FGADX Risk / Return Rank: 29
FGADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FGADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
FGADX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FGADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
FGADX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIJDX vs. FGADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z (FIJDX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIJDX	FGADX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	1.37	-0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	1.79	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.24	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	1.76	-0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.99	4.72	-1.72

FIJDX vs. FGADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIJDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the FGADX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIJDX and FGADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIJDX vs. FGADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIJDX drawdown since its inception was -50.43%, smaller than the maximum FGADX drawdown of -78.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIJDX and FGADX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIJDX	FGADX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.43%	-78.57%	+28.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.39%	-34.73%	-0.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.39%	-34.73%	-0.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.91%	-48.77%	+2.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-49.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.63%	-33.93%	-0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.54%	-34.70%	+16.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.41%	12.92%	+0.49%

Volatility

FIJDX vs. FGADX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z (FIJDX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX) have volatilities of 18.10% and 17.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIJDX	FGADX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.10%	17.83%	+0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.30%	38.32%	-0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.49%	44.73%	+0.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.20%	34.32%	-0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.70%	33.09%	+1.61%

FIJDX vs. FGADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIJDX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FGADX's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIJDX vs. FGADX - Dividend Comparison

FIJDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, less than FGADX's 11.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FGADX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class	11.03%	9.81%	12.51%	3.09%	0.00%	8.83%	10.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.62%	8.38%
FIJDX Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z	5.74%	2.17%	3.63%	1.16%	0.38%	1.71%	4.54%	0.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIJDX and FGADX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FIJDX and FGADX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FIJDX or FGADX?

FIJDX has higher volatility (18.10%) compared to FGADX (17.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIJDX dropped -50.43% vs FGADX's -78.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.