FIIIX vs. FSPSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class I (FIIIX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX).
FIIIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 2007. FSPSX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 1997.
Performance
FIIIX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIIIX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIIIX Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class I | -5.87% | 17.90% | 4.86% | 20.87% | -23.21% | 15.45% | 16.95% | 34.01% | -11.52% | 28.79% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | -1.94% | 31.98% | 3.70% | 18.31% | -14.23% | 11.45% | 8.16% | 22.03% | -13.55% | 25.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIIIX achieves a -5.87% return, which is significantly lower than FSPSX's -1.94% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FIIIX having a 8.28% annualized return and FSPSX not far ahead at 8.65%.
FIIIX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -13.47%
- YTD
- -5.87%
- 6M
- -5.59%
- 1Y
- 8.90%
- 3Y*
- 8.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.41%
- 10Y*
- 8.28%
FSPSX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -10.86%
- YTD
- -1.94%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 19.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIIIX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIIIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIIIX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank
FIIIX
FSPSX
FIIIX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class I (FIIIX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIIIX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.44 | 1.11 | -0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.74 | 1.56 | -0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.23 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 1.54 | -1.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.99 | 5.93 | -3.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIIIX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 1.11 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.51 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.53 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.46 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIIIX and FSPSX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIIIX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison
FIIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, more than FSPSX's 3.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIIIX Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class I | 3.66% | 3.44% | 0.78% | 0.47% | 1.65% | 1.93% | 0.12% | 1.00% | 0.91% | 0.12% | 1.28% | 0.77% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | 3.22% | 3.15% | 3.27% | 2.79% | 2.66% | 3.07% | 1.84% | 3.18% | 2.79% | 2.50% | 3.08% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
FIIIX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIIIX drawdown since its inception was -55.97%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIIIX and FSPSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIIIX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.97% | -33.69% | -22.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.99% | -11.39% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.95% | -29.41% | -5.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.95% | -33.69% | -1.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.99% | -10.86% | -3.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.49% | -6.59% | -3.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 2.96% | +0.56% |
Volatility
FIIIX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class I (FIIIX) has a higher volatility of 7.99% compared to Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) at 7.04%. This indicates that FIIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIIIX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.99% | 7.04% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.66% | 10.63% | +2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.96% | 16.79% | +2.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 15.77% | +1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 16.47% | +1.05% |