FIIIX vs. WFMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class I (FIIIX) and Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX).
FIIIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 2007. WFMIX is managed by Allspring Global Investments.
Performance
FIIIX vs. WFMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIIIX vs. WFMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIIIX Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class I | -5.87% | 17.90% | 4.86% | 20.87% | -23.21% | 15.45% | 16.95% | 34.01% | -11.52% | 28.79% |
WFMIX Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I | 0.81% | 6.14% | 11.95% | 9.54% | -4.65% | 28.53% | 3.27% | 40.27% | -13.12% | 11.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIIIX achieves a -5.87% return, which is significantly lower than WFMIX's 0.81% return. Over the past 10 years, FIIIX has underperformed WFMIX with an annualized return of 8.28%, while WFMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.19% annualized return.
FIIIX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -13.47%
- YTD
- -5.87%
- 6M
- -5.59%
- 1Y
- 8.90%
- 3Y*
- 8.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.41%
- 10Y*
- 8.28%
WFMIX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -8.75%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 9.15%
- 3Y*
- 9.18%
- 5Y*
- 7.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIIIX vs. WFMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIIIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than WFMIX's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIIIX vs. WFMIX — Risk / Return Rank
FIIIX
WFMIX
FIIIX vs. WFMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class I (FIIIX) and Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIIIX | WFMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.44 | 0.56 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.74 | 0.92 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.12 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 0.72 | -0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.99 | 2.55 | -0.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIIIX | WFMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 0.56 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.45 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.54 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.45 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIIIX and WFMIX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIIIX vs. WFMIX - Dividend Comparison
FIIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than WFMIX's 11.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIIIX Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class I | 3.66% | 3.44% | 0.78% | 0.47% | 1.65% | 1.93% | 0.12% | 1.00% | 0.91% | 0.12% | 1.28% | 0.77% |
WFMIX Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I | 11.15% | 11.24% | 8.00% | 5.51% | 8.71% | 9.87% | 0.66% | 7.48% | 2.74% | 4.41% | 1.44% | 4.47% |
Drawdowns
FIIIX vs. WFMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIIIX drawdown since its inception was -55.97%, which is greater than WFMIX's maximum drawdown of -52.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIIIX and WFMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIIIX | WFMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.97% | -52.70% | -3.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.99% | -11.57% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.95% | -22.13% | -12.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.95% | -43.80% | +8.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.99% | -8.99% | -5.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.49% | -7.53% | -2.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 3.27% | +0.25% |
Volatility
FIIIX vs. WFMIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class I (FIIIX) has a higher volatility of 7.99% compared to Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX) at 4.89%. This indicates that FIIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIIIX | WFMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.99% | 4.89% | +3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.66% | 10.28% | +2.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.96% | 17.39% | +1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 17.15% | +0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 18.86% | -1.34% |