PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIGTX vs. GSMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIGTX vs. GSMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Government Fund (FIGTX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIGTX achieves a -0.30% return, which is significantly lower than GSMIX's 1.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FIGTX has underperformed GSMIX with an annualized return of 0.90%, while GSMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.48% annualized return.


FIGTX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
-0.30%
6M
0.10%
1Y
3.04%
3Y*
3.31%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
0.90%

GSMIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.49%
YTD
1.53%
6M
1.96%
1Y
6.09%
3Y*
4.23%
5Y*
1.01%
10Y*
2.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIGTX vs. GSMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIGTX
Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Government Fund
-0.30%6.15%1.72%3.93%-9.25%-2.58%5.77%4.57%0.94%0.28%
GSMIX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund
1.53%4.12%3.03%6.41%-9.77%2.80%3.57%7.49%2.83%5.55%

Correlation

The correlation between FIGTX and GSMIX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1994

0.49

The correlation between FIGTX and GSMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (10 years) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIGTX vs. GSMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIGTX
FIGTX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
FIGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FIGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

GSMIX
GSMIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GSMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GSMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIGTX vs. GSMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Government Fund (FIGTX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIGTXGSMIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.05

2.49

-1.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.67

4.02

-2.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.60

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

2.49

-1.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.22

8.53

-4.31

FIGTX vs. GSMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIGTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the GSMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIGTX and GSMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIGTXGSMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

2.49

-1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.28

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.64

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.96

-0.27

Drawdowns

FIGTX vs. GSMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIGTX drawdown since its inception was -14.00%, smaller than the maximum GSMIX drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGTX and GSMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIGTXGSMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.00%

-15.43%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.26%

-2.46%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.98%

-5.37%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.04%

-14.33%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.00%

-14.33%

+0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-0.41%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.73%

-2.40%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

0.72%

0.00%

Volatility

FIGTX vs. GSMIX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Government Fund (FIGTX) has a higher volatility of 0.95% compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX) at 0.85%. This indicates that FIGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIGTXGSMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

0.85%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.07%

1.77%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91%

2.38%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.28%

3.67%

+0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.43%

3.92%

-0.49%

FIGTX vs. GSMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIGTX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GSMIX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIGTX vs. GSMIX - Dividend Comparison

FIGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than GSMIX's 3.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIGTX
Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Government Fund
3.65%3.78%4.00%3.61%1.51%0.89%1.37%2.23%1.95%1.31%1.28%1.24%
GSMIX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund
3.50%4.32%3.31%2.82%1.86%1.92%2.11%2.57%2.79%2.99%3.35%3.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIGTX and GSMIX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIGTX has higher volatility (0.95%) compared to GSMIX (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIGTX dropped -14.00% vs GSMIX's -15.43%.

GSMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIGTX and GSMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer