FIGTX vs. GSMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Government Fund (FIGTX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX).
FIGTX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Feb 17, 1983. GSMIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jul 19, 1993.
Performance
FIGTX vs. GSMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIGTX vs. GSMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIGTX Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Government Fund | -0.58% | 6.15% | 1.72% | 3.93% | -9.25% | -2.58% | 5.77% | 4.57% | 0.94% | 0.28% |
GSMIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund | -0.49% | 4.12% | 3.03% | 6.41% | -9.77% | 2.80% | 3.57% | 7.49% | 2.83% | 5.55% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIGTX achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than GSMIX's -0.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FIGTX has underperformed GSMIX with an annualized return of 0.89%, while GSMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.42% annualized return.
FIGTX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- -0.58%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 3.00%
- 3Y*
- 2.96%
- 5Y*
- 0.05%
- 10Y*
- 0.89%
GSMIX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 3.18%
- 3Y*
- 3.53%
- 5Y*
- 0.95%
- 10Y*
- 2.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIGTX vs. GSMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIGTX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GSMIX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIGTX vs. GSMIX — Risk / Return Rank
FIGTX
GSMIX
FIGTX vs. GSMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Government Fund (FIGTX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIGTX | GSMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 0.92 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.92 | 1.26 | +0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.26 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 0.88 | +1.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.92 | 3.14 | +2.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIGTX | GSMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 0.92 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.26 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.62 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.95 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIGTX and GSMIX is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FIGTX vs. GSMIX - Dividend Comparison
FIGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than GSMIX's 3.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIGTX Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Government Fund | 3.39% | 3.78% | 4.00% | 3.61% | 1.51% | 0.89% | 1.37% | 2.23% | 1.95% | 1.31% | 1.28% | 1.24% |
GSMIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund | 3.52% | 4.32% | 3.31% | 2.82% | 1.86% | 1.92% | 2.11% | 2.57% | 2.79% | 2.99% | 3.35% | 3.43% |
Drawdowns
FIGTX vs. GSMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIGTX drawdown since its inception was -14.00%, smaller than the maximum GSMIX drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGTX and GSMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIGTX | GSMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.00% | -15.43% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.93% | -4.44% | +2.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.04% | -14.33% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.00% | -14.33% | +0.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -2.39% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.74% | -2.41% | -0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.64% | 1.25% | -0.61% |
Volatility
FIGTX vs. GSMIX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Government Fund (FIGTX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX) have volatilities of 0.89% and 0.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIGTX | GSMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.89% | 0.88% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.89% | 1.46% | +0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.21% | 4.48% | -1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.24% | 3.64% | +0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.41% | 3.90% | -0.49% |