PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIGTX vs. GSMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIGTX vs. GSMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Government Fund (FIGTX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIGTX achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than GSMIX's 0.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FIGTX has underperformed GSMIX with an annualized return of 0.80%, while GSMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.22% annualized return.


FIGTX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.62%
6M
-0.80%
YTD
-0.73%
1Y
1.96%
3Y*
3.41%
5Y*
-0.10%
10Y*
0.80%
ALL TIME*
2.64%

GSMIX

1D
-0.20%
1M
-1.56%
6M
-0.01%
YTD
0.75%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
3.64%
5Y*
0.65%
10Y*
2.22%
ALL TIME*
3.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FIGTX vs. GSMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIGTX
Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Government Fund
-0.73%6.15%1.72%3.93%-9.25%-2.58%5.77%4.57%0.94%0.28%
GSMIX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund
0.75%4.12%3.03%6.41%-9.77%2.80%3.57%7.49%2.83%5.55%

Correlation

The correlation between FIGTX and GSMIX is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1994

0.49

The correlation between FIGTX and GSMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (10 years) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIGTX vs. GSMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIGTX
FIGTX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FIGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FIGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

GSMIX
GSMIX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
GSMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GSMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIGTX vs. GSMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Government Fund (FIGTX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIGTXGSMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.55

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

2.27

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.26

7.71

-5.46

FIGTX vs. GSMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIGTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the GSMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIGTX and GSMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIGTX vs. GSMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIGTX drawdown since its inception was -14.00%, smaller than the maximum GSMIX drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGTX and GSMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIGTXGSMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.00%

-15.43%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.26%

-2.46%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.95%

-4.81%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.04%

-14.33%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.00%

-14.33%

+0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.77%

-1.56%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.73%

-2.39%

-0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.72%

+0.20%

Volatility

FIGTX vs. GSMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Government Fund (FIGTX) is 0.68%, while Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX) has a volatility of 0.75%. This indicates that FIGTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIGTXGSMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

0.75%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.21%

1.92%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90%

2.41%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.30%

3.69%

+0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.43%

3.92%

-0.49%

FIGTX vs. GSMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIGTX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GSMIX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIGTX vs. GSMIX - Dividend Comparison

FIGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than GSMIX's 3.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIGTX
Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Government Fund
3.35%3.78%4.00%3.61%1.51%0.89%1.37%2.23%1.95%1.31%1.28%1.24%
GSMIX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund
3.23%4.32%3.31%2.82%1.86%1.92%2.11%2.57%2.79%2.99%3.35%3.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIGTX and GSMIX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSMIX has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to FIGTX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIGTX dropped -14.00% vs GSMIX's -15.43%.

GSMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIGTX and GSMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer