PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIGS vs. TSEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FIGS vs. TSEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) and Tower Semiconductor Ltd (TSEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIGS achieves a 5.28% return, which is significantly lower than TSEM's 123.91% return.


FIGS

1D
6.03%
1M
-2.05%
YTD
5.28%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
129.56%
3Y*
11.41%
5Y*
-18.94%
10Y*

TSEM

1D
1.77%
1M
-2.90%
YTD
123.91%
6M
121.05%
1Y
553.70%
3Y*
86.93%
5Y*
56.98%
10Y*
35.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIGS vs. TSEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FIGS
FIGS, Inc.
5.28%83.52%-10.94%3.27%-75.58%-2.61%
TSEM
Tower Semiconductor Ltd
123.91%127.96%68.77%-29.35%8.87%45.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FIGS and TSEM is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FIGS:

$2.35B

TSEM:

$30.06B

EPS

FIGS:

$0.22

TSEM:

$2.15

PE Ratio

FIGS:

54.44

TSEM:

122.04

PEG Ratio

FIGS:

0.21

TSEM:

4.30

PS Ratio

FIGS:

3.32

TSEM:

18.47

PB Ratio

FIGS:

5.45

TSEM:

10.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

FIGS:

$666.10M

TSEM:

$1.62B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FIGS:

$443.68M

TSEM:

$401.63M

EBITDA (TTM)

FIGS:

$56.86M

TSEM:

$571.93M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIGS vs. TSEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIGS
FIGS Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FIGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIGS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FIGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIGS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

TSEM
TSEM Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TSEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
TSEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSEM Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIGS vs. TSEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) and Tower Semiconductor Ltd (TSEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIGSTSEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.74

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

22.31

-18.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.67

77.52

-66.85

FIGS vs. TSEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIGS Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is lower than the TSEM Sharpe Ratio of 8.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIGS and TSEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIGS vs. TSEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIGS drawdown since its inception was -92.77%, smaller than the maximum TSEM drawdown of -99.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGS and TSEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIGSTSEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.77%

-99.75%

+6.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.11%

-25.04%

-9.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.56%

-46.78%

-10.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.77%

-55.39%

-37.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.13%

-56.05%

-20.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.87%

-85.38%

+9.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.19%

7.20%

+4.99%

Volatility

FIGS vs. TSEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) is 13.33%, while Tower Semiconductor Ltd (TSEM) has a volatility of 25.08%. This indicates that FIGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIGSTSEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.33%

25.08%

-11.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.28%

55.81%

-4.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.47%

68.83%

-6.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.12%

47.30%

+22.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.30%

43.61%

+26.69%

Dividends

FIGS vs. TSEM - Dividend Comparison

Neither FIGS nor TSEM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

FIGS vs. TSEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FIGS, Inc. and Tower Semiconductor Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
159.90M
413.63M
(FIGS) Total Revenue
(TSEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FIGS vs. TSEM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FIGS, Inc. and Tower Semiconductor Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
67.7%
26.8%
Portfolio components
FIGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FIGS, Inc. reported a gross profit of 108.30M and revenue of 159.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.7%.

TSEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tower Semiconductor Ltd reported a gross profit of 110.95M and revenue of 413.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.8%.

FIGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FIGS, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.48M and revenue of 159.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.

TSEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tower Semiconductor Ltd reported an operating income of 64.57M and revenue of 413.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.

FIGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FIGS, Inc. reported a net income of 6.29M and revenue of 159.90M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.

TSEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tower Semiconductor Ltd reported a net income of 65.03M and revenue of 413.63M, resulting in a net margin of 15.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FIGS and TSEM have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSEM has higher volatility (25.08%) compared to FIGS (13.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIGS dropped -92.77% vs TSEM's -99.75%.

TSEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.13 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIGS and TSEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer