FIGS vs. INBX
FIGS (FIGS, Inc.) and INBX (Inhibrx, Inc.) are both stocks. FIGS operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical), while INBX operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past year, FIGS returned 129.56% vs 543.41% for INBX. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FIGS vs. INBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIGS achieves a 5.28% return, which is significantly lower than INBX's 16.71% return.
FIGS
- 1D
- 6.03%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- 5.28%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- 129.56%
- 3Y*
- 11.41%
- 5Y*
- -18.94%
- 10Y*
- —
INBX
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- -21.83%
- YTD
- 16.71%
- 6M
- 15.87%
- 1Y
- 543.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIGS vs. INBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FIGS FIGS, Inc. | 5.28% | 83.52% | 16.79% |
INBX Inhibrx, Inc. | 16.71% | 412.99% | 18.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIGS and INBX is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2024 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
FIGS:
$2.35B
INBX:
$1.44B
FIGS:
$0.22
INBX:
-$8.40
FIGS:
3.32
INBX:
1.10K
FIGS:
$666.10M
INBX:
$1.30M
FIGS:
$443.68M
INBX:
-$508.00K
FIGS:
$56.86M
INBX:
-$117.63M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIGS vs. INBX — Risk / Return Rank
FIGS
INBX
FIGS vs. INBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) and Inhibrx, Inc. (INBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIGS | INBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.68 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 14.18 | -10.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.67 | 34.82 | -24.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIGS vs. INBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIGS drawdown since its inception was -92.77%, which is greater than INBX's maximum drawdown of -39.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGS and INBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIGS | INBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.77% | -39.84% | -52.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.11% | -38.66% | +4.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.13% | -35.00% | -41.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.87% | -17.07% | -58.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.19% | 15.71% | -3.52% |
Volatility
FIGS vs. INBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) is 13.33%, while Inhibrx, Inc. (INBX) has a volatility of 17.27%. This indicates that FIGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIGS | INBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.33% | 17.27% | -3.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.28% | 61.72% | -10.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.47% | 129.27% | -66.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.12% | 100.32% | -30.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.30% | 100.32% | -30.02% |
Dividends
FIGS vs. INBX - Dividend Comparison
Neither FIGS nor INBX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
FIGS vs. INBX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FIGS, Inc. and Inhibrx, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FIGS and INBX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INBX has higher volatility (17.27%) compared to FIGS (13.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIGS dropped -92.77% vs INBX's -39.84%.
INBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.24 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIGS and INBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer