FIGR vs. UTHR
Compare and contrast key facts about Figure Technology Solutions, Inc (FIGR) and United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR).
Performance
FIGR vs. UTHR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIGR vs. UTHR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FIGR Figure Technology Solutions, Inc | -16.87% | 31.28% |
UTHR United Therapeutics Corporation | 21.70% | 20.36% |
Fundamentals
FIGR:
$8.41B
UTHR:
$28.40B
FIGR:
$0.61
UTHR:
$27.90
FIGR:
55.98
UTHR:
21.25
FIGR:
0.05
UTHR:
0.70
FIGR:
14.78
UTHR:
8.91
FIGR:
6.85
UTHR:
4.00
FIGR:
$506.87M
UTHR:
$3.18B
FIGR:
$441.81M
UTHR:
$2.80B
FIGR:
$186.20M
UTHR:
$1.82B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIGR achieves a -16.87% return, which is significantly lower than UTHR's 21.70% return.
FIGR
- 1D
- 10.55%
- 1M
- 34.30%
- YTD
- -16.87%
- 6M
- -6.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UTHR
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 17.68%
- YTD
- 21.70%
- 6M
- 41.45%
- 1Y
- 92.36%
- 3Y*
- 38.34%
- 5Y*
- 25.25%
- 10Y*
- 18.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIGR vs. UTHR — Risk / Return Rank
FIGR
UTHR
FIGR vs. UTHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Figure Technology Solutions, Inc (FIGR) and United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIGR | UTHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.39 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIGR and UTHR is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FIGR vs. UTHR - Dividend Comparison
Neither FIGR nor UTHR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FIGR vs. UTHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIGR drawdown since its inception was -65.80%, smaller than the maximum UTHR drawdown of -93.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGR and UTHR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIGR | UTHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.80% | -93.18% | +27.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.07% | 0.00% | -54.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.87% | -35.53% | +9.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.43% | — |
Volatility
FIGR vs. UTHR - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIGR | UTHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 26.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 113.11% | 50.41% | +62.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 113.11% | 35.89% | +77.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 113.11% | 35.32% | +77.79% |
Financials
FIGR vs. UTHR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Figure Technology Solutions, Inc and United Therapeutics Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FIGR vs. UTHR - Profitability Comparison
FIGR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Figure Technology Solutions, Inc reported a gross profit of 198.00M and revenue of 223.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.7%.
UTHR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, United Therapeutics Corporation reported a gross profit of 686.80M and revenue of 790.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.9%.
FIGR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Figure Technology Solutions, Inc reported an operating income of 64.99M and revenue of 223.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.1%.
UTHR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, United Therapeutics Corporation reported an operating income of 356.70M and revenue of 790.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.1%.
FIGR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Figure Technology Solutions, Inc reported a net income of 15.16M and revenue of 223.18M, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.
UTHR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, United Therapeutics Corporation reported a net income of 364.30M and revenue of 790.20M, resulting in a net margin of 46.1%.