FIGR vs. SNOW
Compare and contrast key facts about Figure Technology Solutions, Inc (FIGR) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW).
Performance
FIGR vs. SNOW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIGR vs. SNOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FIGR Figure Technology Solutions, Inc | -16.87% | 31.28% |
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | -31.25% | -2.30% |
Fundamentals
FIGR:
$8.41B
SNOW:
$51.62B
FIGR:
$0.61
SNOW:
-$3.96
FIGR:
14.78
SNOW:
10.83
FIGR:
6.85
SNOW:
25.57
FIGR:
$506.87M
SNOW:
$4.68B
FIGR:
$441.81M
SNOW:
$3.15B
FIGR:
$186.20M
SNOW:
-$1.27B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIGR achieves a -16.87% return, which is significantly higher than SNOW's -31.25% return.
FIGR
- 1D
- 10.55%
- 1M
- 34.30%
- YTD
- -16.87%
- 6M
- -6.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNOW
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- -10.44%
- YTD
- -31.25%
- 6M
- -33.13%
- 1Y
- 3.19%
- 3Y*
- -0.76%
- 5Y*
- -8.63%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIGR vs. SNOW — Risk / Return Rank
FIGR
SNOW
FIGR vs. SNOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Figure Technology Solutions, Inc (FIGR) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIGR | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | -0.15 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIGR and SNOW is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FIGR vs. SNOW - Dividend Comparison
Neither FIGR nor SNOW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FIGR vs. SNOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIGR drawdown since its inception was -65.80%, smaller than the maximum SNOW drawdown of -72.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGR and SNOW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIGR | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.80% | -72.99% | +7.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -45.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -72.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.07% | -62.47% | +8.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.87% | -48.76% | +22.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.43% | — |
Volatility
FIGR vs. SNOW - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIGR | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 35.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 113.11% | 51.93% | +61.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 113.11% | 58.92% | +54.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 113.11% | 60.50% | +52.61% |
Financials
FIGR vs. SNOW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Figure Technology Solutions, Inc and Snowflake Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FIGR vs. SNOW - Profitability Comparison
FIGR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Figure Technology Solutions, Inc reported a gross profit of 198.00M and revenue of 223.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.7%.
SNOW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a gross profit of 857.66M and revenue of 1.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.8%.
FIGR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Figure Technology Solutions, Inc reported an operating income of 64.99M and revenue of 223.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.1%.
SNOW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported an operating income of -318.16M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in an operating margin of -24.8%.
FIGR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Figure Technology Solutions, Inc reported a net income of 15.16M and revenue of 223.18M, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.
SNOW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a net income of -309.55M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in a net margin of -24.1%.