FIGR vs. SNOW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FIGR (Figure Technology Solutions, Inc) and SNOW (Snowflake Inc.) are both stocks. FIGR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while SNOW operates in Software - Application (Technology). At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FIGR vs. SNOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Figure Technology Solutions, Inc (FIGR) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIGR achieves a -31.49% return, which is significantly lower than SNOW's 5.04% return.

FIGR

• 1D: -3.82%
• 1M: -17.58%
• YTD: -31.49%
• 6M: -37.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SNOW

• 1D: 1.69%
• 1M: 33.80%
• YTD: 5.04%
• 6M: 2.36%
• 1Y: 7.81%
• 3Y*: 8.93%
• 5Y*: -1.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIGR vs. SNOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FIGR Figure Technology Solutions, Inc	-31.49%	13.44%
SNOW Snowflake Inc.	5.04%	-2.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FIGR and SNOW is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025	0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap FIGR : $6.96B SNOW : $79.58B
EPS FIGR : $0.79 SNOW : -$3.53
PS Ratio FIGR : 10.30 SNOW : 15.54
PB Ratio FIGR : 5.39 SNOW : 38.62
Total Revenue (TTM) FIGR : $618.46M SNOW : $5.03B
Gross Profit (TTM) FIGR : $392.90M SNOW : $3.38B
EBITDA (TTM) FIGR : $212.61M SNOW : -$1.21B

Return for Risk

FIGR vs. SNOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIGR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SNOW

SNOW Risk / Return Rank: 47
SNOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
SNOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
SNOW Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SNOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
SNOW Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIGR vs. SNOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Figure Technology Solutions, Inc (FIGR) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIGR	SNOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.12	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.73	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.09	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.14	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.30	—

Drawdowns

FIGR vs. SNOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIGR drawdown since its inception was -65.80%, smaller than the maximum SNOW drawdown of -72.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGR and SNOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIGR	SNOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.80%	-72.99%	+7.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-56.30%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.30%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-72.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.14%	-42.67%	-19.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.07%	-48.99%	+14.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	26.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FIGR	SNOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	35.88%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	52.67%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	103.00%	65.50%	+37.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	103.00%	61.95%	+41.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	103.00%	62.58%	+40.42%

Dividends

FIGR vs. SNOW - Dividend Comparison

Neither FIGR nor SNOW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

FIGR vs. SNOW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Figure Technology Solutions, Inc and Snowflake Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FIGR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Figure Technology Solutions, Inc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 167.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SNOW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a gross profit of 926.45M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.6%.

FIGR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Figure Technology Solutions, Inc reported an operating income of 41.94M and revenue of 167.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.1%.

SNOW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported an operating income of -326.15M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.5%.

FIGR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Figure Technology Solutions, Inc reported a net income of 44.95M and revenue of 167.01M, resulting in a net margin of 26.9%.

SNOW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a net income of -295.57M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of -21.3%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIGR and SNOW in my portfolio?

FIGR and SNOW have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.