FIGFX vs. VT

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FIGFX (Fidelity International Growth Fund) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both funds - FIGFX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, FIGFX returned 9.16%/yr vs 12.39%/yr for VT. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FIGFX charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

FIGFX vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Growth Fund (FIGFX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIGFX achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 11.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FIGFX has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 9.16%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.39% annualized return.

FIGFX

• 1D: 3.82%
• 1M: -2.67%
• 6M: 2.05%
• YTD: 7.52%
• 1Y: 14.70%
• 3Y*: 11.57%
• 5Y*: 4.85%
• 10Y*: 9.16%
• ALL TIME*: 6.04%

VT

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -0.20%
• 6M: 7.80%
• YTD: 11.15%
• 1Y: 23.51%
• 3Y*: 18.19%
• 5Y*: 10.58%
• 10Y*: 12.39%
• ALL TIME*: 8.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FIGFX Fidelity International Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	$425.08M	$369.63M	$481.55M

FIGFX vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIGFX Fidelity International Growth Fund	7.52%	17.91%	4.90%	20.89%	-23.19%	15.42%	16.95%	33.97%	-11.52%	28.83%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	11.15%	22.43%	16.49%	22.02%	-18.00%	18.27%	16.59%	26.81%	-9.76%	24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FIGFX and VT is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008	0.90

The correlation between FIGFX and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIGFX vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIGFX

FIGFX Risk / Return Rank: 21
FIGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FIGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
FIGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
FIGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
FIGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 70
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIGFX vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Growth Fund (FIGFX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIGFX	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.65	1.59	-0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	2.23	-1.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.29	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.97	2.29	-1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.30	9.54	-6.23

FIGFX vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIGFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIGFX and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIGFX vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIGFX drawdown since its inception was -55.97%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGFX and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIGFX	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.97%	-50.27%	-5.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.95%	-9.67%	-4.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.51%	-16.51%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.91%	-26.38%	-8.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.91%	-34.24%	-0.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.79%	-1.84%	-2.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.34%	-6.97%	-3.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.07%	2.32%	+1.75%

Volatility

FIGFX vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Growth Fund (FIGFX) has a higher volatility of 6.81% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.99%. This indicates that FIGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIGFX	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.81%	3.99%	+2.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.29%	11.68%	+6.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.62%	13.96%	+6.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.59%	16.22%	+2.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.91%	17.18%	+0.73%

FIGFX vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIGFX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIGFX vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

FIGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than VT's 1.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIGFX Fidelity International Growth Fund	3.20%	3.44%	0.78%	0.48%	1.66%	1.93%	0.11%	0.97%	0.88%	0.12%	1.24%	0.77%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.59%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIGFX and VT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FIGFX and VT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FIGFX or VT?

FIGFX has higher volatility (6.81%) compared to VT (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIGFX dropped -55.97% vs VT's -50.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.