FIGFX vs. OIGAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity International Growth Fund (FIGFX) and Invesco Oppenheimer International Growth Fund Class A (OIGAX).
FIGFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 2007. OIGAX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Mar 25, 1996.
Performance
FIGFX vs. OIGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIGFX vs. OIGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIGFX Fidelity International Growth Fund | -2.20% | 17.91% | 4.90% | 20.89% | -23.19% | 15.42% | 16.95% | 33.97% | -11.52% | 28.83% |
OIGAX Invesco Oppenheimer International Growth Fund Class A | -10.39% | 15.86% | -1.85% | 20.93% | -27.31% | 10.38% | 22.11% | 28.62% | -19.53% | 26.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIGFX achieves a -2.20% return, which is significantly higher than OIGAX's -10.39% return. Over the past 10 years, FIGFX has outperformed OIGAX with an annualized return of 8.70%, while OIGAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.43% annualized return.
FIGFX
- 1D
- 3.83%
- 1M
- -8.74%
- YTD
- -2.20%
- 6M
- -2.07%
- 1Y
- 12.55%
- 3Y*
- 9.84%
- 5Y*
- 4.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
OIGAX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -11.46%
- YTD
- -10.39%
- 6M
- -8.99%
- 1Y
- 3.18%
- 3Y*
- 3.64%
- 5Y*
- -0.22%
- 10Y*
- 4.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIGFX vs. OIGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIGFX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than OIGAX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIGFX vs. OIGAX — Risk / Return Rank
FIGFX
OIGAX
FIGFX vs. OIGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Growth Fund (FIGFX) and Invesco Oppenheimer International Growth Fund Class A (OIGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIGFX | OIGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.68 | 0.13 | +0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.08 | 0.31 | +0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.04 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 0.11 | +0.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.49 | 0.44 | +3.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIGFX | OIGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 0.13 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | -0.01 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.24 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.37 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIGFX and OIGAX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIGFX vs. OIGAX - Dividend Comparison
FIGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, less than OIGAX's 49.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIGFX Fidelity International Growth Fund | 3.52% | 3.44% | 0.78% | 0.48% | 1.66% | 1.93% | 0.11% | 0.97% | 0.88% | 0.12% | 1.24% | 0.77% |
OIGAX Invesco Oppenheimer International Growth Fund Class A | 49.15% | 44.04% | 11.27% | 11.59% | 0.00% | 13.52% | 14.72% | 0.84% | 1.08% | 0.59% | 1.02% | 0.87% |
Drawdowns
FIGFX vs. OIGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIGFX drawdown since its inception was -55.97%, smaller than the maximum OIGAX drawdown of -67.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGFX and OIGAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIGFX | OIGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.97% | -67.43% | +11.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.95% | -14.61% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.91% | -40.41% | +5.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.91% | -40.41% | +5.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.65% | -15.14% | +4.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.46% | -17.37% | +6.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 3.79% | -0.21% |
Volatility
FIGFX vs. OIGAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity International Growth Fund (FIGFX) has a higher volatility of 9.06% compared to Invesco Oppenheimer International Growth Fund Class A (OIGAX) at 7.01%. This indicates that FIGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OIGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIGFX | OIGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.06% | 7.01% | +2.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.19% | 11.67% | +1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.35% | 17.79% | +1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 18.65% | -1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.56% | 18.37% | -0.81% |