OIGAX vs. PRNHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Oppenheimer International Growth Fund Class A (OIGAX) and T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund (PRNHX).
OIGAX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Mar 25, 1996. PRNHX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 3, 1960.
Performance
OIGAX vs. PRNHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OIGAX vs. PRNHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OIGAX Invesco Oppenheimer International Growth Fund Class A | -10.39% | 15.86% | -1.85% | 20.93% | -27.31% | 10.38% | 22.11% | 28.62% | -19.53% | 26.61% |
PRNHX T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund | -5.34% | 3.27% | 8.80% | 21.35% | -36.96% | 9.96% | 58.05% | 56.50% | 3.79% | 31.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OIGAX achieves a -10.39% return, which is significantly lower than PRNHX's -5.34% return. Over the past 10 years, OIGAX has underperformed PRNHX with an annualized return of 4.43%, while PRNHX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.93% annualized return.
OIGAX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -11.46%
- YTD
- -10.39%
- 6M
- -8.99%
- 1Y
- 3.18%
- 3Y*
- 3.64%
- 5Y*
- -0.22%
- 10Y*
- 4.43%
PRNHX
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- -10.89%
- YTD
- -5.34%
- 6M
- -3.56%
- 1Y
- 10.01%
- 3Y*
- 6.27%
- 5Y*
- -1.84%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OIGAX vs. PRNHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OIGAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than PRNHX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OIGAX vs. PRNHX — Risk / Return Rank
OIGAX
PRNHX
OIGAX vs. PRNHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Oppenheimer International Growth Fund Class A (OIGAX) and T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund (PRNHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OIGAX | PRNHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.13 | 0.37 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.31 | 0.70 | -0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.09 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.11 | 0.46 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.44 | 1.71 | -1.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OIGAX | PRNHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 | 0.37 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | -0.08 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.57 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.47 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between OIGAX and PRNHX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
OIGAX vs. PRNHX - Dividend Comparison
OIGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.15%, more than PRNHX's 12.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OIGAX Invesco Oppenheimer International Growth Fund Class A | 49.15% | 44.04% | 11.27% | 11.59% | 0.00% | 13.52% | 14.72% | 0.84% | 1.08% | 0.59% | 1.02% | 0.87% |
PRNHX T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund | 12.52% | 11.85% | 9.82% | 0.00% | 4.72% | 17.09% | 13.67% | 23.46% | 13.94% | 8.27% | 5.77% | 7.72% |
Drawdowns
OIGAX vs. PRNHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OIGAX drawdown since its inception was -67.43%, roughly equal to the maximum PRNHX drawdown of -70.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OIGAX and PRNHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OIGAX | PRNHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.43% | -70.96% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.61% | -13.70% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.41% | -48.37% | +7.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.41% | -48.37% | +7.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.14% | -27.08% | +11.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.37% | -18.39% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.79% | 3.67% | +0.12% |
Volatility
OIGAX vs. PRNHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Oppenheimer International Growth Fund Class A (OIGAX) is 7.01%, while T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund (PRNHX) has a volatility of 7.88%. This indicates that OIGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRNHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OIGAX | PRNHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 7.88% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | 14.48% | -2.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.79% | 23.87% | -6.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 24.41% | -5.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 22.67% | -4.30% |