OIGAX vs. EFG
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Oppenheimer International Growth Fund Class A (OIGAX) and iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG).
OIGAX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Mar 25, 1996. EFG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Growth Index. It was launched on Aug 1, 2005.
Performance
OIGAX vs. EFG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OIGAX vs. EFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OIGAX Invesco Oppenheimer International Growth Fund Class A | -10.39% | 15.86% | -1.85% | 20.93% | -27.31% | 10.38% | 22.11% | 28.62% | -19.53% | 26.61% |
EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF | -0.19% | 20.70% | 1.53% | 17.55% | -23.12% | 11.01% | 17.85% | 27.47% | -12.93% | 28.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OIGAX achieves a -10.39% return, which is significantly lower than EFG's -0.19% return. Over the past 10 years, OIGAX has underperformed EFG with an annualized return of 4.43%, while EFG has yielded a comparatively higher 7.52% annualized return.
OIGAX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -11.46%
- YTD
- -10.39%
- 6M
- -8.99%
- 1Y
- 3.18%
- 3Y*
- 3.64%
- 5Y*
- -0.22%
- 10Y*
- 4.43%
EFG
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -5.61%
- YTD
- -0.19%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 16.47%
- 3Y*
- 8.73%
- 5Y*
- 3.91%
- 10Y*
- 7.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OIGAX vs. EFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
OIGAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than EFG's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OIGAX vs. EFG — Risk / Return Rank
OIGAX
EFG
OIGAX vs. EFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Oppenheimer International Growth Fund Class A (OIGAX) and iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OIGAX | EFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.13 | 0.86 | -0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.31 | 1.33 | -1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.18 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.11 | 1.30 | -1.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.44 | 4.95 | -4.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OIGAX | EFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 | 0.86 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.22 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.43 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.28 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between OIGAX and EFG is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
OIGAX vs. EFG - Dividend Comparison
OIGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.15%, more than EFG's 2.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OIGAX Invesco Oppenheimer International Growth Fund Class A | 49.15% | 44.04% | 11.27% | 11.59% | 0.00% | 13.52% | 14.72% | 0.84% | 1.08% | 0.59% | 1.02% | 0.87% |
EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF | 2.53% | 2.53% | 1.64% | 1.63% | 1.27% | 1.54% | 0.85% | 1.69% | 1.98% | 1.56% | 2.20% | 1.75% |
Drawdowns
OIGAX vs. EFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OIGAX drawdown since its inception was -67.43%, which is greater than EFG's maximum drawdown of -58.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OIGAX and EFG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OIGAX | EFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.43% | -58.40% | -9.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.61% | -12.78% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.41% | -35.78% | -4.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.41% | -35.78% | -4.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.14% | -7.85% | -7.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.37% | -12.23% | -5.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.79% | 3.36% | +0.43% |
Volatility
OIGAX vs. EFG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Oppenheimer International Growth Fund Class A (OIGAX) is 7.01%, while iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) has a volatility of 8.29%. This indicates that OIGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OIGAX | EFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 8.29% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | 12.61% | -0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.79% | 19.14% | -1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 17.88% | +0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 17.55% | +0.82% |