FIGB vs. FETH
FIGB (Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF) and FETH (Fidelity Ethereum Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FIGB is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FETH is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index. FIGB is actively managed, while FETH is passively managed. Over the past year, FIGB returned 3.65% vs -37.69% for FETH. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FIGB charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FETH.
Performance
FIGB vs. FETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIGB achieves a -0.26% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -36.85% return.
FIGB
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- 6M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- -0.26%
- 1Y
- 3.65%
- 3Y*
- 3.86%
- 5Y*
- -0.12%
- 10Y*
- —
FETH
- 1D
- 5.89%
- 1M
- 12.79%
- 6M
- -41.51%
- YTD
- -36.85%
- 1Y
- -37.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIGB vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FIGB Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF | -0.26% | 6.95% | 0.99% |
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | -36.85% | -11.37% | -4.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIGB and FETH is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIGB vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank
FIGB
FETH
FIGB vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIGB | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.94 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | -0.56 | +1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.55 | -0.87 | +4.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIGB vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIGB drawdown since its inception was -18.08%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -67.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGB and FETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIGB | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.08% | -67.94% | +49.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | -67.94% | +65.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.00% | -61.36% | +59.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.82% | -34.57% | +27.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 43.30% | -42.27% |
Volatility
FIGB vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB) is 1.25%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 16.77%. This indicates that FIGB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIGB | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 16.77% | -15.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.05% | 47.34% | -44.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.03% | 68.43% | -64.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.29% | 71.91% | -65.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.13% | 71.91% | -65.78% |
FIGB vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIGB has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIGB vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison
FIGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FIGB Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF | 4.13% | 4.15% | 4.28% | 3.79% | 2.44% | 1.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIGB and FETH have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FETH has higher volatility (16.77%) compared to FIGB (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIGB dropped -18.08% vs FETH's -67.94%.
On 1-year performance, FIGB leads with 3.65% vs -37.69% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FIGB has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FIGB has performed better with a 3.65% return vs -37.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FIGB.
FIGB has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.
FIGB is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FIGB and 0.25% for FETH.
FIGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIGB and FETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer