PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIGB vs. FDHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FIGB vs. FDHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB) and Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FIGB vs. FDHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FIGB
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF
0.03%6.95%1.51%6.65%-13.43%1.77%
FDHY
Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF
-0.03%9.24%7.53%11.14%-11.30%4.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIGB achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly higher than FDHY's -0.03% return.


FIGB

1D
0.28%
1M
-1.71%
YTD
0.03%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.28%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
0.45%
10Y*

FDHY

1D
0.93%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
-0.03%
6M
1.70%
1Y
7.87%
3Y*
7.80%
5Y*
3.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FIGB vs. FDHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIGB has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FDHY's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FIGB vs. FDHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIGB
FIGB Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FIGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIGB Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FIGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIGB Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FDHY
FDHY Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FDHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDHY Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FDHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDHY Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIGB vs. FDHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB) and Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIGBFDHYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

1.50

-0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.19

2.16

-0.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.34

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

1.78

-0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.12

9.89

-5.77

FIGB vs. FDHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIGB Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the FDHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIGB and FDHY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIGBFDHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

1.50

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.54

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.69

-0.63

Correlation

The correlation between FIGB and FDHY is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FIGB vs. FDHY - Dividend Comparison

FIGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, less than FDHY's 6.60% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FIGB
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF
4.12%4.15%4.28%3.79%2.44%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDHY
Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF
6.60%6.56%6.58%6.26%5.34%6.09%5.78%4.94%2.55%

Drawdowns

FIGB vs. FDHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIGB drawdown since its inception was -18.08%, smaller than the maximum FDHY drawdown of -20.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGB and FDHY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FIGBFDHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.08%

-20.01%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.46%

-4.54%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.08%

-16.38%

-1.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-1.21%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.11%

-2.93%

-4.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

0.82%

+0.31%

Volatility

FIGB vs. FDHY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB) is 1.71%, while Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY) has a volatility of 1.89%. This indicates that FIGB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FIGBFDHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.71%

1.89%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.70%

2.72%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.16%

5.29%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.25%

7.11%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.22%

8.12%

-1.90%