PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIG.TO vs. CCBI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIG.TO vs. CCBI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIG.TO) and CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF (CCBI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIG.TO achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly higher than CCBI.TO's 0.83% return.


FIG.TO

1D
-0.11%
1M
-1.05%
6M
0.45%
YTD
1.08%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
5.55%
5Y*
0.64%
10Y*
2.20%
ALL TIME*
2.99%

CCBI.TO

1D
-0.11%
1M
-1.48%
6M
0.27%
YTD
0.83%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
-0.50%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$275.96KCA$286.08KCA$301.22K
CA$4.68KCA$7.04KCA$27.00K

FIG.TO vs. CCBI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FIG.TO
CI Investment Grade Bond ETF
1.08%5.12%5.10%6.23%-12.53%1.84%
CCBI.TO
CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF
0.83%2.17%4.26%4.11%-9.05%2.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FIG.TO and CCBI.TO is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2021

0.41

The correlation between FIG.TO and CCBI.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.55 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIG.TO vs. CCBI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIG.TO
FIG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FIG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FIG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

CCBI.TO
CCBI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CCBI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCBI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCBI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CCBI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCBI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIG.TO vs. CCBI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIG.TO) and CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF (CCBI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIG.TOCCBI.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.18

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

1.36

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.15

3.35

+0.79

FIG.TO vs. CCBI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the CCBI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIG.TO and CCBI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIG.TO vs. CCBI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIG.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.80%, smaller than the maximum CCBI.TO drawdown of -17.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIG.TO and CCBI.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIG.TOCCBI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.80%

-17.72%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.27%

-2.72%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.97%

-4.34%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.97%

-17.72%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-2.64%

+1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.43%

-7.90%

+4.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

1.10%

-0.16%

Volatility

FIG.TO vs. CCBI.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIG.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.26% compared to CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF (CCBI.TO) at 1.15%. This indicates that FIG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCBI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIG.TOCCBI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

1.15%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.19%

3.34%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.40%

4.20%

+0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.43%

6.82%

-1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.15%

6.97%

-0.82%

Dividends

FIG.TO vs. CCBI.TO - Dividend Comparison

FIG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, more than CCBI.TO's 3.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCBI.TO
CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF
3.36%3.22%2.85%2.78%2.60%1.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FIG.TO
CI Investment Grade Bond ETF
4.08%4.04%4.08%4.12%4.19%3.52%3.34%3.41%3.60%4.34%4.69%5.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIG.TO and CCBI.TO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIG.TO is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while CCBI.TO is Total Bond Market. They also come from different issuers: CI and CIBC Asset Management Inc..

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIG.TO and CCBI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer