PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCBI.TO vs. XIC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCBI.TO vs. XIC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF (CCBI.TO) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCBI.TO achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than XIC.TO's 12.87% return.


CCBI.TO

1D
-0.11%
1M
-1.48%
6M
0.27%
YTD
0.83%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
-0.50%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.75%

XIC.TO

1D
0.48%
1M
1.99%
6M
7.88%
YTD
12.87%
1Y
32.03%
3Y*
23.13%
5Y*
14.75%
10Y*
12.39%
ALL TIME*
9.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$275.96KCA$286.08KCA$301.22K
CA$27.73MCA$28.37MCA$26.69M

CCBI.TO vs. XIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CCBI.TO
CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF
0.83%2.17%4.26%4.11%-9.05%2.30%
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
12.87%31.51%21.48%11.74%-5.82%14.41%

Correlation

The correlation between CCBI.TO and XIC.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2021

0.16

The correlation between CCBI.TO and XIC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCBI.TO vs. XIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCBI.TO
CCBI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CCBI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCBI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCBI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CCBI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCBI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

XIC.TO
XIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCBI.TO vs. XIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF (CCBI.TO) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCBI.TOXIC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.43

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

3.47

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.35

15.68

-12.32

CCBI.TO vs. XIC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCBI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCBI.TO and XIC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCBI.TO vs. XIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCBI.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.72%, smaller than the maximum XIC.TO drawdown of -47.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCBI.TO and XIC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCBI.TOXIC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.72%

-47.27%

+29.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.72%

-9.29%

+6.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.34%

-12.27%

+7.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.72%

-16.24%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.64%

-0.30%

-2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.90%

-6.72%

-1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

2.05%

-0.95%

Volatility

CCBI.TO vs. XIC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF (CCBI.TO) is 1.15%, while iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) has a volatility of 2.47%. This indicates that CCBI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XIC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCBI.TOXIC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

2.47%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.34%

10.72%

-7.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.20%

13.23%

-9.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.82%

13.20%

-6.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.97%

14.96%

-7.99%

CCBI.TO vs. XIC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCBI.TO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than XIC.TO's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CCBI.TO vs. XIC.TO - Dividend Comparison

CCBI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than XIC.TO's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCBI.TO
CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF
3.36%3.22%2.85%2.78%2.60%1.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
1.99%2.23%2.64%2.96%3.10%2.45%3.03%3.01%3.19%2.49%2.72%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCBI.TO and XIC.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XIC.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XIC.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for CCBI.TO.

CCBI.TO is categorized as Total Bond Market, while XIC.TO is Canada Equities. CCBI.TO tracks FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index, while XIC.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: CIBC Asset Management Inc. and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CCBI.TO and 0.06% for XIC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCBI.TO and XIC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer