CCBI.TO vs. ZAG.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF (CCBI.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO).
CCBI.TO and ZAG.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZAG.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index. It was launched on Jan 19, 2010.
Performance
CCBI.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCBI.TO achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly higher than ZAG.TO's 0.11% return.
CCBI.TO
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 0.58%
- 3Y*
- 3.06%
- 5Y*
- 0.67%
- 10Y*
- —
ZAG.TO
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- 0.11%
- 6M
- -0.18%
- 1Y
- 0.42%
- 3Y*
- 3.21%
- 5Y*
- 0.59%
- 10Y*
- 1.66%
CCBI.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCBI.TO CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF | 0.27% | 2.17% | 4.26% | 4.11% | -9.05% | 2.30% |
ZAG.TO BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 0.11% | 2.25% | 4.48% | 6.41% | -11.60% | 2.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCBI.TO and ZAG.TO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined. Holding both can reduce overall portfolio volatility compared to holding either one alone.
CCBI.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCBI.TO vs. ZAG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CCBI.TO
ZAG.TO
CCBI.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF (CCBI.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCBI.TO | ZAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.15 | 0.12 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.23 | 0.19 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.02 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | 0.10 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.52 | 0.20 | +0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCBI.TO | ZAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | 0.12 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.44 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
CCBI.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCBI.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.72%, roughly equal to the maximum ZAG.TO drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCBI.TO and ZAG.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCBI.TO | ZAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.72% | -18.03% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -2.79% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.72% | -15.77% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.18% | -2.63% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -3.56% | -4.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.33% | 1.35% | -0.02% |
Volatility
CCBI.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Volatility Comparison
CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF (CCBI.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) have volatilities of 1.86% and 1.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CCBI.TO | ZAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.86% | 1.93% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.85% | 2.97% | -0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.47% | 4.64% | -0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.10% | 6.53% | +0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.08% | 7.09% | -0.01% |
Dividends
CCBI.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Dividend Comparison
CCBI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than ZAG.TO's 3.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCBI.TO CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF | 3.30% | 3.22% | 2.85% | 2.78% | 2.60% | 1.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZAG.TO BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 3.48% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.47% | 3.56% | 3.04% | 2.88% | 3.03% | 2.92% | 2.95% | 3.07% | 3.13% |