FIFVX vs. FCGSX
FIFVX (Fidelity Advisor Founders Fund Class I) and FCGSX (Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FIFVX returned 13.35%/yr vs 19.86%/yr for FCGSX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIFVX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FCGSX.
Performance
FIFVX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIFVX achieves a 9.17% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's 23.92% return.
FIFVX
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 6.76%
- YTD
- 9.17%
- 6M
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 23.83%
- 3Y*
- 25.49%
- 5Y*
- 13.35%
- 10Y*
- —
FCGSX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 8.76%
- YTD
- 23.92%
- 6M
- 25.96%
- 1Y
- 56.65%
- 3Y*
- 34.73%
- 5Y*
- 19.86%
- 10Y*
- 24.67%
FIFVX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIFVX Fidelity Advisor Founders Fund Class I | 9.17% | 16.39% | 36.46% | 34.03% | -26.71% | 19.10% | 47.20% | 14.05% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | 23.92% | 25.52% | 38.00% | 45.97% | -32.15% | 25.13% | 70.01% | 21.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIFVX and FCGSX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2019 | 0.94 |
The correlation between FIFVX and FCGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIFVX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank
FIFVX
FCGSX
FIFVX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Founders Fund Class I (FIFVX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIFVX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.54 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 5.62 | -3.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.12 | 25.64 | -17.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIFVX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 3.32 | -1.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.84 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.98 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
FIFVX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIFVX drawdown since its inception was -32.48%, smaller than the maximum FCGSX drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIFVX and FCGSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIFVX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.48% | -38.77% | +6.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.27% | -10.42% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.26% | -26.07% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.48% | -38.77% | +6.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | 0.00% | -0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.99% | -6.96% | -1.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.28% | +0.74% |
Volatility
FIFVX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Founders Fund Class I (FIFVX) has a higher volatility of 4.74% compared to Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) at 4.38%. This indicates that FIFVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIFVX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.74% | 4.38% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.40% | 13.35% | -1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.79% | 17.66% | -2.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.18% | 23.66% | -2.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.59% | 23.24% | -0.65% |
FIFVX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIFVX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIFVX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison
FIFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than FCGSX's 8.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | 8.45% | 10.48% | 12.49% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 38.65% | 31.99% | 11.06% | 13.21% | 10.51% | 2.44% | 0.25% |
FIFVX Fidelity Advisor Founders Fund Class I | 2.20% | 2.40% | 6.32% | 0.15% | 2.60% | 6.25% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIFVX and FCGSX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIFVX has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to FCGSX (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIFVX dropped -32.48% vs FCGSX's -38.77%.
FCGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIFVX and FCGSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer