FIDU vs. IFRA
FIDU (Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF) and IFRA (iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FIDU is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index, while IFRA is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index (TR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FIDU returned 13.30%/yr vs 13.28%/yr for IFRA. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FIDU charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IFRA.
Performance
FIDU vs. IFRA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FIDU having a 16.05% return and IFRA slightly lower at 16.00%.
FIDU
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- 6M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- 16.05%
- 1Y
- 21.56%
- 3Y*
- 18.89%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- 14.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.64%
IFRA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.67%
- 6M
- 8.92%
- YTD
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- 16.79%
- 5Y*
- 13.28%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.05M | $8.74M | $9.96M | |
| $20.72M | $20.65M | $23.36M |
FIDU vs. IFRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF | 16.05% | 18.61% | 16.51% | 22.62% | -8.36% | 20.96% | 13.72% | 30.69% | -12.06% |
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 16.00% | 15.90% | 17.02% | 13.42% | -3.32% | 29.81% | 7.37% | 27.00% | -7.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIDU and IFRA is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018 | 0.86 |
The correlation between FIDU and IFRA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
FIDU vs. IFRA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FIDU
IFRA
Industrials
Technology
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
Industrials
FIDU
IFRA
Technology
FIDU
IFRA
-
Utilities
FIDU
IFRA
Basic Materials
FIDU
IFRA
Consumer Cyclical
FIDU
IFRA
Financial Services
FIDU
IFRA
-
Real Estate
FIDU
IFRA
-
Consumer Defensive
FIDU
IFRA
Healthcare
FIDU
IFRA
-
Communication Services
FIDU
IFRA
-
Energy
FIDU
IFRA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIDU vs. IFRA — Risk / Return Rank
FIDU
IFRA
FIDU vs. IFRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIDU | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.24 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 2.61 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.39 | 8.59 | -2.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIDU vs. IFRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIDU drawdown since its inception was -42.31%, roughly equal to the maximum IFRA drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDU and IFRA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIDU | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.31% | -41.06% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.23% | -8.40% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.52% | -19.93% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.87% | -19.93% | -2.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.41% | -5.46% | +1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.77% | -5.09% | +0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 2.55% | +0.54% |
Volatility
FIDU vs. IFRA - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) has a higher volatility of 5.09% compared to iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) at 4.01%. This indicates that FIDU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIDU | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.09% | 4.01% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.73% | 12.02% | +2.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.03% | 15.40% | +2.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 17.87% | +0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.37% | 21.29% | -0.92% |
FIDU vs. IFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIDU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IFRA's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIDU vs. IFRA - Dividend Comparison
FIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than IFRA's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF | 0.95% | 1.02% | 1.42% | 1.42% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 1.28% | 1.73% | 1.99% | 1.60% | 1.63% | 1.98% |
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 1.61% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 1.68% | 2.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIDU and IFRA have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIDU has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to IFRA (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDU dropped -42.31% vs IFRA's -41.06%.
On 5-year performance, FIDU leads with 13.30% vs 13.28% for IFRA. On fees, FIDU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IFRA has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FIDU has performed better with a 13.30% return vs 13.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FIDU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IFRA.
IFRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.95% for FIDU.
FIDU is categorized as Industrials Equities, while IFRA is Infrastructure Equities. FIDU tracks MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index, while IFRA tracks NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index (TR). They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FIDU and 0.30% for IFRA.
IFRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIDU and IFRA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer