FIDU vs. FBCG
FIDU (Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF) and FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FIDU is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index, while FBCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. FIDU is passively managed, while FBCG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FIDU returned 12.80%/yr vs 15.84%/yr for FBCG. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIDU charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FBCG.
Performance
FIDU vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FIDU having a 14.93% return and FBCG slightly higher at 15.59%.
FIDU
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 14.93%
- 6M
- 15.53%
- 1Y
- 26.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
FBCG
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 7.84%
- YTD
- 15.59%
- 6M
- 15.51%
- 1Y
- 39.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.60%
- 5Y*
- 15.84%
- 10Y*
- —
FIDU vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF | 14.93% | 18.61% | 16.51% | 22.62% | -8.36% | 20.96% | 26.57% |
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 15.59% | 18.60% | 39.05% | 57.98% | -39.10% | 21.34% | 42.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIDU and FBCG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020 | 0.64 |
The correlation between FIDU and FBCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
FIDU vs. FBCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FIDU
FBCG
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
FIDU
FBCG
Technology
FIDU
FBCG
Consumer Cyclical
FIDU
FBCG
Basic Materials
FIDU
FBCG
Financial Services
FIDU
FBCG
Utilities
FIDU
FBCG
Communication Services
FIDU
FBCG
Energy
FIDU
FBCG
Healthcare
FIDU
FBCG
Consumer Defensive
FIDU
-
FBCG
Real Estate
FIDU
-
FBCG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIDU vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank
FIDU
FBCG
FIDU vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIDU | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.36 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 2.61 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.09 | 10.14 | -1.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIDU | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 2.14 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.62 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.83 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
FIDU vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIDU drawdown since its inception was -42.31%, roughly equal to the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDU and FBCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIDU | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.31% | -43.56% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.23% | -15.17% | +2.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.52% | -27.89% | +7.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.87% | -43.56% | +20.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -1.05% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -11.49% | +6.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 3.90% | -0.94% |
Volatility
FIDU vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) at 4.79%. This indicates that FIDU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIDU | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 4.79% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.52% | 13.89% | -0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.50% | 18.55% | -2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 25.79% | -7.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.31% | 25.72% | -5.41% |
FIDU vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIDU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIDU vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison
FIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than FBCG's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF | 0.95% | 1.02% | 1.42% | 1.42% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 1.28% | 1.73% | 1.99% | 1.60% | 1.63% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIDU and FBCG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIDU has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to FBCG (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDU dropped -42.31% vs FBCG's -43.56%.
On 5-year performance, FBCG leads with 15.84% vs 12.80% for FIDU. On fees, FIDU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FBCG has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FBCG has performed better with a 15.84% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FIDU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FBCG.
FIDU has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.04% for FBCG.
FIDU is categorized as Industrials Equities, while FBCG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FIDU and 0.59% for FBCG.
FBCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIDU and FBCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer