PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIDU vs. FBCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIDU vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FIDU having a 14.93% return and FBCG slightly higher at 15.59%.


FIDU

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.22%
YTD
14.93%
6M
15.53%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
22.62%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
14.31%

FBCG

1D
-1.05%
1M
7.84%
YTD
15.59%
6M
15.51%
1Y
39.38%
3Y*
30.60%
5Y*
15.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDU vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FIDU
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF
14.93%18.61%16.51%22.62%-8.36%20.96%26.57%
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
15.59%18.60%39.05%57.98%-39.10%21.34%42.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDU and FBCG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020

0.64

The correlation between FIDU and FBCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

FIDU vs. FBCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIDU
FBCG

Industrials

92.1%
5.7%

Technology

6.4%
48.3%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
17.2%

Basic Materials

0.2%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
2.2%

Utilities

0.1%
0.5%

Communication Services

0.0%
16.6%

Energy

0.0%
0.4%

Healthcare

0.0%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.3%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Industrials

FIDU
92.1%
FBCG
5.7%

Technology

FIDU
6.4%
FBCG
48.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FIDU
1.0%
FBCG
17.2%

Basic Materials

FIDU
0.2%
FBCG
0.6%

Financial Services

FIDU
0.2%
FBCG
2.2%

Utilities

FIDU
0.1%
FBCG
0.5%

Communication Services

FIDU
0.0%
FBCG
16.6%

Energy

FIDU
0.0%
FBCG
0.4%

Healthcare

FIDU
0.0%
FBCG
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

FIDU

-

FBCG
1.3%

Real Estate

FIDU

-

FBCG
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIDU vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDU
FIDU Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FBCG
FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDU vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIDUFBCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.36

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.61

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.09

10.14

-1.05

FIDU vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDU Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDU and FBCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIDUFBCGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

2.14

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.62

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.83

-0.17

Drawdowns

FIDU vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDU drawdown since its inception was -42.31%, roughly equal to the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDU and FBCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDUFBCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.31%

-43.56%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-15.17%

+2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.52%

-27.89%

+7.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.87%

-43.56%

+20.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-1.05%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-11.49%

+6.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

3.90%

-0.94%

Volatility

FIDU vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) at 4.79%. This indicates that FIDU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDUFBCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

4.79%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.52%

13.89%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.50%

18.55%

-2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.27%

25.79%

-7.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

25.72%

-5.41%

FIDU vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIDU vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

FIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than FBCG's 0.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
0.04%0.05%0.12%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FIDU
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF
0.95%1.02%1.42%1.42%1.48%1.12%1.28%1.73%1.99%1.60%1.63%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIDU and FBCG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIDU has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to FBCG (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDU dropped -42.31% vs FBCG's -43.56%.

On 5-year performance, FBCG leads with 15.84% vs 12.80% for FIDU. On fees, FIDU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FBCG has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FBCG has performed better with a 15.84% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FIDU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FBCG.

FIDU has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.04% for FBCG.

FIDU is categorized as Industrials Equities, while FBCG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FIDU and 0.59% for FBCG.

FBCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIDU and FBCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer